Skip to content

[Suggestion] Marlin uses much bigger K range for linear/pressure advance which might confuse users trying to calibrate it #171

@JuaniElias

Description

@JuaniElias

I was following this amazing guide and when I started calibrating the K value for linear advance with the Pattern Method I started with values from 0 to 0.08 with direct drive as suggested on the Calibration Tool and most other guides but I realized all lines were almost exaclty the same so I started incrementing values slowly but still, nothing changed.
When I searched on the Marlin docs I found out that the K value was changed, as per this page), to range more from 0.1-2.0 which is far off from the starting suggested values.
Would it be possible to also show these values both on the guide and on the calibration tool itself on a small note as a more accurate starting point for Marling?
Thanks to everyone that has contributed to this guide! It has been an invaluable resource so far so thank you!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions