From 239870f647eda93c9ee3b68c324c81d7e489e2ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vojtak42 <18753137+Vojtak42@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 13:36:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Update pattern_method.md

Implemented in 2.8.0
---
 articles/pressure_linear_advance/pattern_method.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/articles/pressure_linear_advance/pattern_method.md b/articles/pressure_linear_advance/pattern_method.md
index 1410d08..f54bd76 100644
--- a/articles/pressure_linear_advance/pattern_method.md
+++ b/articles/pressure_linear_advance/pattern_method.md
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ In this example, I would choose around 0.04 (in green).
 I find I get the best real prints when I lean toward **higher** values.
 
 - For example - if your sharpest corner has a _tiny_ bit of gapping, I'd still personally choose it.\
-  _(And then I'd just cover up the slight gapping with single top perimeters - which is unfortunately exclusive to SuperSlicer.)_
+  _(And then I'd just cover up the slight gapping with single top perimeters - which is unfortunately exclusive to SuperSlicer and PrusaSlicer.)_
 
 - The sharpness of these corners has a large effect on the outer surface or prints, particularly surrounding features like logos, text, slots, etc.