Skip to content

sbc rank histogram bug #33

@hyunjimoon

Description

@hyunjimoon

Under the setting


precision ={
    "S": 1, # # of draws from prior
    "M": 500, # # of draws from posterior (# of chains * # of draws from each chain)
    "N": 30, # # of observation
    "R": 8 # # of subgroups for hierarchical Bayes
}

setting = {
    "est_param_names" : ["adj_frac1_loc","adj_frac2_loc", "adj_frac3_loc", "adj_frac1", "adj_frac2","adj_frac3"],# "ss2p_frac4"],# "ss2p_frac4"
    "hier_est_param_names": ["adj_frac1", "adj_frac2", "adj_frac3"],# "ss2p_frac4"],
    "target_simulated_vector_names" : ["ss", "s"],
    "driving_vector_names" : ["exog_demand", "process_noise_normal_driving"],
    "model_name": "2hier_s_lgnorm_.01"
}
init_order = 100

the following rank figure is observed; the total sum (2+2+1+3 = 8) which means each hierarchy is treated separately when calculating rank.
image

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions