-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Open
Labels
frameworkDiscussion on the underlying model documentation frameworkDiscussion on the underlying model documentation framework
Description
How can we code the different representation in models of the smaller seas and rivers connected to the Mediterranean? Here is how it is coded at the moment:
model-documentation/_models/CNRM-RCSM6B.md
Lines 258 to 273 in cedf590
| feature_representation: | |
| - name: red_sea | |
| representation: none | |
| - name: black_sea | |
| representation: prescribed | |
| input: e_p_r_budget | |
| - name: rivers | |
| representation: coupled | |
| description: Coupled river input except for the Nile river | |
| - name: nile_river | |
| representation: prescribed | |
| input: climatological_seasonal_cycle | |
| description: > | |
| A climatological seasonal cycle is applied, with a yearly average of 444 m3 s-1 | |
| (Erika Coppola, Med-CORDEX community, | |
| https://www.medcordex.eu/Med-CORDEX-2 baseline-runs protocol.pdf) |
Can we agree on a set of parameters to describe the different treatment which is valid across models? Would it be better to just write a small paragraph describing it in words?
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
frameworkDiscussion on the underlying model documentation frameworkDiscussion on the underlying model documentation framework