Skip to content

Upstream kernel? #1

@amstan

Description

@amstan

I was looking at issue MiSTerArch/PKGBUILDs#12 and thought: wouldn't it be cool if we could just use the linux-armv7 arch package that's already tracking upstream?

Sigh, what am I getting into?

https://github.com/MiSTer-devel/Linux-Kernel_MiSTer/commits/MiSTer-v5.15

Doesn't seem like there's much to it. I can boil it down to:

  • DTS for de10 with lots of mister additions
    • I wonder if this can be upstreamed and the mister additions be had with just a dt overlay (that can even be loaded later via userspace)
  • Mister Framebuffer: 1 file, looks pretty self contained, could probably be a module
  • Mister Alsa driver: 1 file, looks pretty self contained, could probably be a module
  • A ton of random device (that people use with their misters) driver fixes that I'm baffled why they have to be in this kernel tree and not upstream. If I were to maintain my own kernel I would drop this.
  • A few intrusive core driver changes: usb overcurrent, vty count, input device ioctls.
  • EXFAT + loop device hacks, really unnecessary with something like Arch.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions