Consider supporting SBC-GS image

[seriyps]

There is an alternative image for Radxa with much more features: https://github.com/zhouruixi/SBC-GS

Might be cool to have a look and decide if it can be supported as well.

[mikecarr]

Does this help? Configurable file locations

[seriyps]

I personally do not use that image, created the ticket just as a suggestion. So it is hard for me to tell if the support is good or not. Did I get it correctly that your proposal is to make the paths to the config files and scripts configurable?
FYI @zhouruixi

[mikecarr]

yes, correct

[seriyps]

Well, for me personally it sounds a bit strange to let the end user edit the file locations. I rater expect the ground station developers to define those locations in some config files when they assemble their OS images 🤔 . So for the end user it just works out of the box

[mikecarr]

You have a good point. That kind of access is potential security issue. I always think what do I want, as a developer/hacker and necessarilty about security.

…

On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 2:15 PM Sergey Prokhorov ***@***.***> wrote: Well, for me personally it sounds a bit strange to let the end user edit the file locations. I rater expect the ground station developers to define those locations in some config files when they assemble their OS images 🤔 . — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#15 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAPBBJTUCYUIM36QQ6NPLLTZ7UZWTAVCNFSM6AAAAABP2SGP36VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINRVHAZTGNZZGU> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[zhouruixi]

SBC GS of mine is still on active dev, when it stable I'll try to build improver in.

[mikecarr]

I removed settings page for now but we can add a config with the correct file locations
py-config-gs.json