Skip to content

relative importance for spatial polygons #1

@PhDyellow

Description

@PhDyellow

An extension to 6.6 "solutions portfolios" would be to use eval_replacement_importance() on the Taz data.

p9 <- prob %>%
      add_min_set_objective() %>%
      add_relative_targets(0.2) %>%
      add_locked_in_constraints("locked_in") %>%
      add_locked_out_constraints("locked_out") %>%
      add_binary_decisions() %>%
      add_gurobi_solver(verbose = TRUE)
      # add_lpsymphony_solver(verbose = FALSE)
# solve problem
s9 <- solve(p9)

# plot solution
plot_solution(s9)


s9x <- s9
s9x@data <- s9@data[, "solution_1", drop = FALSE]
ri9 <- eval_replacement_importance(p9, s9x)

spplot(ri9, zcol = "rc")

Notice the section where I have to do some modification to s9 to make it work. This might be a bug in prioritizr.

s9x <- s9
s9x@data <- s9@data[, "solution_1", drop = FALSE]

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions