Skip to content

Inconsistent Type Declarations #13

@ankonyeni

Description

@ankonyeni

define.yaml is inconsistent in how it declares string types: some slots use explicit range: string, while others omit range and rely on the implicit string default. This makes it unclear whether missing ranges are intentional or accidental.

Examples

With explicit range:

resourceType:
  description: Type of resource
  range: string

Without range:

protocol:
  description: Protocol used by the service (e.g., HTTPS, FTP)

Question

Should we treat missing ranges as intentionally string, require explicit range: string everywhere, or remove all range: string declarations and set default_range: string at the schema level for consistency?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions