create a nice way to handle string matching between different components

[minhnh]

Currently, we have a dictionary for matching object names between the different levels of knowledge and planning. We should handle this more nicely, potentially through adding custom fields in object definitions at some level.

[argenos]

@alex-mitrevski related to this (maybe). Can we populate (at least some of) the ontology from files? e.g list of furniture, list of names etc? Does this need its own issue if so?

[alex-mitrevski]

It's definitely possible to do that. Furniture items, names, etc. are class assertions, so we'd just

1. need to specify the class(es) to which the items belong and
2. write a small script that generates the appropriate tags from that specification and writes them to the ontology file

I think a dedicated issue would however be better.