You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: index.html
+3-3Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ <h2 id="results">Results</h2>
340
340
</tr>
341
341
</tbody>
342
342
</table>
343
-
<figcaptionstyle="text-align: center;">Table 3: Average results on MiniCode-repositories small, using Codex with o4-mini and Claude Code with Claude Sonnet 3.7</figcaption>
343
+
<figcaptionstyle="text-align: center;">Table 3: Average results on MiniCode-repositories small</figcaption>
344
344
</figure>
345
345
346
346
Finally, we present results on the large repo split. Due to the stronger performance of Sonnet models, we evaluate only Sonnet models to minimize cost.
<figcaptionstyle="text-align: center;">Table 4: Average results on MiniCode-repositories large, comparing the original code sources with Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Sonnet 4</figcaption>
374
+
<figcaptionstyle="text-align: center;">Table 4: Average refactoring results on MiniCode-repositories large, comparing the original code sources to refactored sources from Claude Sonnet 3.7 and Sonnet 4</figcaption>
375
375
</figure>
376
376
377
-
Check out the paper for the full CodeContests results, as well as repository results!
377
+
Check out the paper for the full details on results!
0 commit comments