Containers remain running after exiting

[alice-mkh]

In particular, this means it's impossible to remove a toolbox-created container without first stopping/killing it with podman:

 ~/toolbox  ./toolbox create -c test
Created container: test
Enter with: toolbox enter --container test
 ~/toolbox  ./toolbox enter -c test 
🔹[exalm@toolbox toolbox]$ logout
 ~/toolbox  ./toolbox rm test
toolbox: failed to remove container test
 ~/toolbox  podman ps
CONTAINER ID  IMAGE                              COMMAND     CREATED         STATUS             PORTS  NAMES
1a08f09ea797  localhost/fedora-toolbox-exalm:30  sleep +Inf  16 seconds ago  Up 10 seconds ago         test
 ~/toolbox  podman stop test
1a08f09ea79710801859bea8dc6a5a85d2031ce1a73dd7d284c3e1fa51a67be0
 ~/toolbox  ./toolbox rm test
 ~/toolbox  

[debarshiray]

toolbox rm --force should also work.

But yes, I'd like to make this properly reference counted, but sadly, I don't know of a way to implement that using the existing Podman command line interface.

[imciner2]

Using toolbox rm --force is not able to delete the container when it is running on my machine.

Perhaps what would could be done is to detect if the container is running when deleting it and then give the user a prompt such as This toolbox is currently running, are you sure you wish to delete it [y/N]: Then call podman stop before calling the delete command if they choose to continue.

[paul8046]

I am unable to delete a container created by toolbox even after using toolbox rm --force and stopping it with podman. I am having to reboot and then toolbox rm works.

[debarshiray]

I am unable to delete a container created by toolbox even after using
toolbox rm --force and stopping it with podman. I am having to reboot
and then toolbox rm works.

It will fail if you have currently active toolbox enter sessions. We need to improve the error handling there.

Otherwise, if that's not the case and you can reproduce at will, then I suggest trying podman rm --force <container> to delete the container. If that also fails, then we might have a Podman bug. In any case, let's use a different issue to discuss this.

Thanks for stopping by!

[bam80]

Considering it was reported almost 1.5 years ago, I'm wondering if there was any progress since then.

[bam80]

Seems I can't stop the containers left after Toolbox:

[bam@host ~]$ toolbox list
IMAGE ID      IMAGE NAME                                            CREATED
a198bc8c3cda  registry.fedoraproject.org/f31/fedora-toolbox:31      9 months ago
fe7b8c2393f9  registry.fedoraproject.org/f32/fedora-toolbox:32      4 months ago
3864bc58ab7b  registry.fedoraproject.org/f33/fedora-toolbox:33      4 months ago
b390f0663e2a  registry.fedoraproject.org/f33/fedora-toolbox:latest  2 weeks ago

CONTAINER ID  CONTAINER NAME     CREATED       STATUS      IMAGE NAME
c27048bea726  fedora-toolbox-31  6 months ago  configured  registry.fedoraproject.org/f31/fedora-toolbox:31
f48d171dc79e  fedora-toolbox-32  3 months ago  running     registry.fedoraproject.org/f32/fedora-toolbox:32
...
f429c215fa02  toolbox            3 hours ago   running     registry.fedoraproject.org/f32/fedora-toolbox:32


[bam@host ~]$ podman stop fedora-toolbox-32 
2020-08-26T14:33:24.000938739Z: kill process 3459: Operation not permitted
Error: operation not permitted
[bam@host ~]$ podman stop toolbox 
2020-08-26T14:33:32.000453021Z: kill process 3318: Operation not permitted
Error: operation not permitted

[bam@host ~]$ sudo podman stop toolbox 
[sudo] password for bam: 
Error: no container with name or ID toolbox found: no such container

[bam80]

[bam@host ~]$ podman stop fedora-toolbox-32 
2020-08-26T14:33:24.000938739Z: kill process 3459: Operation not permitted
Error: operation not permitted

The reason of the error is seems conmon subprocesses run with weird PID 100000:

bam         3315    1332  0 16:32 ?        Ssl    0:00  \_ /usr/bin/conmon --api-version 1 -c f429c215fa02f617362a0b17c4045eb32d4d8c461c38248fb9e1e0a3d9f1220b -u f429c215fa02f617362a0b17c4045eb32d4d8c461c38248fb
100000      3318    3315  0 16:32 ?        Ss     0:00  |   \_ sleep +Inf
...
bam         3456    1332  0 16:33 ?        Ssl    0:00  \_ /usr/bin/conmon --api-version 1 -c f48d171dc79e0db510fa334827fa5a4693b1f952221bc916666f408d845d5b92 -u f48d171dc79e0db510fa334827fa5a4693b1f952221bc9166
100000      3459    3456  0 16:33 ?        Ss     0:00  |   \_ sleep +Inf

[bam@host ~]$ ll /var/home/bam/.local/share/containers/storage/overlay-containers/f429c215fa02f617362a0b17c4045eb32d4d8c461c38248fb9e1e0a3d9f1220b/
total 4
drwx------. 3 100000 100000 4096 Aug 26 16:38 userdata

What is it? Is it an error, or it's by design?
In the former case, how could I fix my containers?

[debarshiray]

podman stop <container> should definitely work, unless you have active toolbox enter or podman run sessions.

[debarshiray]

So far, I can think of two different ways to make Toolbox containers reference-counted so that they automatically stop once the last toolbox enter or toolbox run session has terminated.

(Note that stopping the container is the same thing as terminating the container's entry point process.)

• The enter and run commands use POSIX signals to tell the container's entry point that a new session is about to start, or has just ended. eg., it could send SIGUSR1 for one and SIGUSR2 for the other. The entry point handles these signals and keeps a reference count of the number of active sessions. Once the counter hits zero, it terminates.

This can be implemented with Go channels, os/signal and such. Here is an example.

The downside of this is that it's not resilient against crashes in the enter and run commands. If they crash, then the second signal indicating the end of the session might not get sent.

• The enter and run sessions acquire shared file locks (ie., flock --shared ...) and the entry point blocks trying to acquire an exclusive lock (ie., flock --exclusive ...) on a common file. The entry point will be unblocked once all shared locks have been released by the active sessions, and then it can terminate.

The nice thing about this is that locks are automatically released by the kernel when a process terminates. So, even if the enter and run commands crash, the locks would get released.

[bam80]

podman stop <container> should definitely work, unless you
have active toolbox enter or podman run sessions.

Still it doesn't, and I have no running sessions.

This sounds like a Podman bug.

If you can repeatedly reproduce this, then I'd suggest filing a Podman bug. It would be even better if you can reproduce this just with Podman commands. eg., podman create ... sleep +Inf a container, then podman start ... and so on.

However, I can kill those sleep processes with 100000 PIDs as usual user,
and then the session stops.
Do you have an idea where that 100000 PIDs come from?

I think those are UIDs, not PIDs.

Those UIDs look big because they are inside a user namespace.

[bam80]

If you can repeatedly reproduce this

Seems I'm not. Not sure if it's good or bad :)
Anyway, I have already filed the podman issue and closed it as non-reproducible. I'll reopen if I face it again:
containers/podman#7463

I think those are UIDs, not PIDs.

Those UIDs look big because they are inside a user namespace.

Of course they are UIDs, sorry.

Thanks!