Possibility to make sequence dynamic if component not present in claim spec

[FACOLOMBANI]

What problem are you facing?

Hi, we have a composition that creates nearly 13 components including usages, and since we have dependencies per components, we specify different sequences, example:
`
rules:

• sequence:
  • component1
  • component1secret
  • component1usage
• sequence:
  • component1
  • component2
  • component2secret1
  • component2secret2
  • component2usage
• sequence:
  • component1
  • component3
  • component3secret
  • component3usage
    `

The problem we are facing is that for some environments we do not need all components and when we remove the not needed components from claim spec. When removing a component from spec, the logic in kcl code does not return that component. Since the component is define on the sequence (hardcoded), the sequencer function keeps waiting for it, and even if all needed component are ready, claim stays in an unready status.

How could this Function help solve your problem?

Is it possible to accept the following feature. Have a key equal to the component key in spec, and check if the component exist in spec, if it doesn't exist, we skip the sequence, if it exists, we append it and take it into account, example:
`
rules:

• component1: <- this key is checked in spec, if not present skipped
  • component1
  • component1secret
  • component1usage
• component2: <- same
  • component1
  • component2
  • component2secret1
  • component2secret2
  • component2usage
• component3: <- same
  • component1
  • component3
  • component3secret
  • component3usage
• sequence: <- keeping this as default behaviour
  • component4
  • component4secret
  • component4usage
    `

Tested on my side, i could propose a PR.

Thanks in advance.