-
|
Hello everyone, I have a question to discuss. I trained the potential function using the DeePMD-kit v3.0.2 version DPA2 descriptor, and the energy and force accuracy were also in good agreement during the dp test process. However, when I used this potential function to run LAMMPS molecular dynamics, I found that it would scatter the structure after 20 ps. The specific details of my training are: 1. Select the temperature range of 50K-500K and use VASP to run AIMD. Check that the structure of the last step is not scattered and select 80% of all data for training. 2. Use the LAMMPS template as follows. My guess is whether AIMD data needs to be cleaned? I don't know, I hope someone can give some suggestions or similar experiences. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Do you know the active learning? It may be just because the data is not enough. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
May I ask how you successfully ran LAMMPS? I am using version 3.1.1 of DeepMD-kit. The tutorial I am following is at https://deepmodeling.com/articles/detail/972da94c-bc35-43b2-af20-6ca943727015/DeePMD-PyTorch. The contents of in.lammps are as follows: bulk waterunits metal neighbor 2.0 bin read_data water.lmp See https://deepmd.rtfd.io/lammps/ for usagepair_style deepmd frozen_model.pth If atom names (O H in this example) are not set in the pair_coeff command, the type_map defined by the training parameter will be used by default.pair_coeff * * O H velocity all create 330.0 23456789 fix 1 all nvt temp 330.0 330.0 0.5 run 1000 MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD NOTE: invoking MPI_ABORT causes Open MPI to kill all MPI processes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.

Do you know the active learning? It may be just because the data is not enough.