-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Description
Hi @furbrain!
At our local caving club we have received the SAP6 and have already field-tested it. There were some changes in measurements compared to the Disto-X2, but the Disto-X2 was not calibrated, so we have to repeat this test. Otherwise the calibration process of the SAP6 is really simple and the device is intuitive enough. We may change the interface and button usage a bit to fit more to our needs. If there are any generic updates or bugfixes, we will prepare a PR.
There were a few weird crashes which we cannot reproduce yet, but we'll try it out more. We even have all the electrical components now to try to make our own (except for the battery, because we'd like your input from #27 first)
One comment from our side is that the 3D prints seem a bit bad, and for a purchased item such as this we would have expected better quality prints. Perhaps your 3D printer is not calibrated well.
The print seems to be warped at the base and at the screen part
![]() |
![]() |
and the cap has some holes in the layers, which is a sign of under-extrusion
Additional comment regarding the glass layer: is there a way that we could protect this? did you have any ideas in the past already? If you agree that it would be a good idea, I can design a TPU "cap" with a hole which would fit on the glass part. Accepting also other ideas
Will continue testing and giving feedback, thanks!



