Tentative list: Who wants to contribute what section?

[jessegmeyerlab]

Making a thread for anyone who wants to claim sections tentatively, and where people can share what they want help with for a section. I can update this post to reflect any comments people post below.

[ger225]

Working on network analysis and enrichment. User norbertvolkmar was also working on enrichment but last time he contributed was on March.

[norbertvolkmar]

@ger225 - that's fine with me. I am still working on other aspects of the biological interpretation section together with Oliver Crook.

[rileynm]

@norbertvolkmar and @ger225, are you still working on enrichment? In the other thread, @yarribas mentioned they had interest too. I am happy to help with this section but don't want to go crazy with it if you have already done a lot of work on it. Thanks! -Nick

[ger225]

Hi @rileynm that was the idea but I´ve been postponing it forever. In fact, I am lagging in the network analysis part, which I will go back to next week. So, I would say go for it, and I will chime in if I have something useful to add.

Regarding the protein enrichment bit: are you talking about "enrichment" in terms of enriching samples for specific proteins (e.g., phosphoproteins)? I was referring to GO term enrichment for biological interpretation. You know, GSEA and stuff like that. Best,

[norbertvolkmar]

We're still working on the biological interpretation part, but happy for others to join in! cheers, norbert

…

________________________________ From: rileynm ***@***.***> Sent: 20 October 2022 06:08 To: jessegmeyerlab/proteomics-tutorial Cc: Volkmar Norbert; Mention Subject: Re: [jessegmeyerlab/proteomics-tutorial] Tentative list: Who wants to contribute what section? (Issue #45) @norbertvolkmar<https://github.com/norbertvolkmar> and @ger225<https://github.com/ger225>, are you still working on enrichment? In the other thread, @yarribas<https://github.com/yarribas> mentioned they had interest too. I am happy to help with this section but don't want to go crazy with it if you have already done a lot of work on it. Thanks! -Nick — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#45 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXKWRAE6ASMXXMJIGOVRJQTWEDAUVANCNFSM556PEVHQ>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***> [ { ***@***.***": "http://schema.org", ***@***.***": "EmailMessage", "potentialAction": { ***@***.***": "ViewAction", "target": "#45 (comment)", "url": "#45 (comment)", "name": "View Issue" }, "description": "View this Issue on GitHub", "publisher": { ***@***.***": "Organization", "name": "GitHub", "url": "https://github.com" } } ]

[rileynm]

Ah ok great! I was thinking more of the protein and peptide enrichment methods in sample prep. Yago (@yarribas from the other thread) and I are coordinating now for the Peptide or Protein Enrichment section of the manuscript, which won't really mention the statistical enrichment methods for biological interpretation... so I think we should be all good with no repeat efforts!

[norbertvolkmar]

Hi everyone - probably not a suitable thread for this question, but nevertheless: Does anyone know whether there are more open scientific collaborative writing projects like this one and where I can find them (does not need to be MS-related)? I really enjoy contributing to projects like this one, so please let me know :)