Skip to content

Missing complete definition of the field relations in the standard table Table Relations Metadata #8185

@navdotnetreqs

Description

@navdotnetreqs

Issue #5512 is still very relevant. Don't we want a product that actually supports generic programming, reflection etc? These kinds of limitations hinder us developers for making good generic solutions, and forces us to duplicate the same code for many record types etc.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions