Skip to content

Validator for ITI-65 only supports MHD 3.2 #497

@Ivan1pl

Description

@Ivan1pl

I'm attempting to use itiRequestValidator to validate MHD 4.x requests (IPF version: 5.1.0). My route looks like this:

        from("mhd-iti65:mhdservice?audit=true")
                // ...
                .setHeader(VALIDATION_MODE, constant(MODEL | SCHEMA))
                .process(itiRequestValidator())
                // ...

As a result, I get errors for everything related to the new MHD specification, e.g.:

In Iti65Validator I found that it has a separate bundle consistency validation based on MHD version:

        if (transactionBundle instanceof Mhd421) {
            validateBundleConsistency421(transactionBundle);
        } else {
            validateBundleConsistency320(transactionBundle);
        }

But then validates using only the instance validator for MHD 3.2:

        var validator = fhirContext.newValidator();
        validator.setValidateAgainstStandardSchema(false);
        validator.setValidateAgainstStandardSchematron(false);
        var instanceValidator = new FhirInstanceValidator(validationSupportv320);
        instanceValidator.setNoTerminologyChecks(false);
        instanceValidator.setErrorForUnknownProfiles(true);
        instanceValidator.setBestPracticeWarningLevel(BestPracticeWarningLevel.Hint);
        validator.registerValidatorModule(instanceValidator);
        var validationResult = validator.validateWithResult(transactionBundle);

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions