From e5e7bf836ab7e9a4d3675481c22b694ad477a672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: roost-io Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2024 09:55:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Unit test generated by RoostGPT Using AI Model roostgpt-4-32k --- pom.xml | 166 ++++++++++-------- .../ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java | 114 ++++++++++++ .../ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java | 63 +++++++ .../ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java | 142 +++++++++++++++ .../ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java | 137 +++++++++++++++ .../ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java | 71 ++++++++ .../model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java | 127 ++++++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java | 120 +++++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java | 109 ++++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java | 103 +++++++++++ .../model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java | 91 ++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java | 131 ++++++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java | 104 +++++++++++ .../products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java | 118 +++++++++++++ target/classes/application.properties | 1 + .../products/ProductsApplication.class | Bin 0 -> 763 bytes .../controller/ProductController.class | Bin 0 -> 5205 bytes .../bootexample4/products/model/Product.class | Bin 0 -> 1487 bytes .../repository/ProductRepository.class | Bin 0 -> 368 bytes .../compile/default-compile/createdFiles.lst | 4 + .../compile/default-compile/inputFiles.lst | 4 + .../default-testCompile/createdFiles.lst | 0 .../default-testCompile/inputFiles.lst | 18 ++ target/test-classes/features/sample.feature | 38 ++++ 24 files changed, 1583 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java create mode 100644 src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java create mode 100644 target/classes/application.properties create mode 100644 target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplication.class create mode 100644 target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductController.class create mode 100644 target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/model/Product.class create mode 100644 target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/repository/ProductRepository.class create mode 100644 target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/createdFiles.lst create mode 100644 target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/inputFiles.lst create mode 100644 target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/createdFiles.lst create mode 100644 target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/inputFiles.lst create mode 100644 target/test-classes/features/sample.feature diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml index db6c2c51..b9926950 100644 --- a/pom.xml +++ b/pom.xml @@ -1,89 +1,99 @@ - - - 4.0.0 - - org.springframework.boot - spring-boot-starter-parent - 3.0.5 - - - com.bootexample4 - products - 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT - products - Demo project for Spring Boot - - 17 - - - - org.springframework.boot - spring-boot-starter-data-jpa - - - - org.mock-server - mockserver-netty - 3.10.8 - - - org.mock-server - mockserver-client-java - 3.10.8 - - - org.springframework.boot - spring-boot-starter-web - - - - com.h2database - h2 - runtime - - - org.springframework.boot - spring-boot-starter-test - test - - + + + 4.0.0 + + org.springframework.boot + spring-boot-starter-parent + 3.0.5 + + + + com.bootexample4 + products + 0.0.1-SNAPSHOT + products + Demo project for Spring Boot + + 17 + + - io.cucumber - cucumber-spring - 7.0.0 - test + org.springframework.boot + spring-boot-starter-data-jpa + + + + org.mock-server + mockserver-netty + 3.10.8 + + + org.mock-server + mockserver-client-java + 3.10.8 + + + org.springframework.boot + spring-boot-starter-web + + + com.h2database + h2 + runtime + + + org.springframework.boot + spring-boot-starter-test + test + + + + io.cucumber + cucumber-spring + 7.0.0 + test - io.cucumber - cucumber-java - 7.0.0 - test + io.cucumber + cucumber-java + 7.0.0 + test - io.cucumber - cucumber-junit - 7.0.0 - test + io.cucumber + cucumber-junit + 7.0.0 + test - org.assertj - assertj-core - 3.19.0 - test + org.assertj + assertj-core + 3.19.0 + test + + + org.junit.jupiter + junit-jupiter-engine + 5.7.2 + test + + + + org.junit.vintage + junit-vintage-engine + 5.2.0 + - - - - - - org.springframework.boot - spring-boot-maven-plugin - - - - - + + + + + org.springframework.boot + spring-boot-maven-plugin + + + + \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fe107fd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=createProduct_16b670a647 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=createProduct_36b748883e + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-915: Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes +Issue: The createProduct method doesn't validate or sanitize the product information before saving it to the database, which could lead to various types of attacks, such as SQL Injection or Cross-Site Scripting. +Solution: Implement input validation to ensure that only valid product data can be saved to the database. Furthermore, any text that will be displayed to users should be properly sanitized to prevent HTML or JavaScript injection. + +Vulnerability: CWE-352: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) +Issue: The controller lacks CSRF protection. An attacker may trick a logged-in user into making an unintended request to your web application which will be treated as legitimate. +Solution: Include CSRF tokens in each state-changing request to ensure that they originate from the correct location. In Spring, you can enable CSRF protection by adding '' inside the '' element in your Spring Security configuration. + +Vulnerability: CWE-306: Missing Authentication for Critical Function +Issue: The method createProduct doesn't have any authentication. If your application doesn't require authentication or if the controller doesn't enforce it, unauthenticated users may be able to create product records. +Solution: Use Spring Security or a similar library to protect sensitive endpoints. Make sure that only authenticated and authorized users can create product records. + +================================================================================ +Scenario 1: Test Create Product using Valid Data + + Details: + TestName: testCreateProductWithValidData(). + Description: This test is meant to check if a product is created and stored in the repository successfully when valid product data is provided. + Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock product object and a product repository. Mock the save method of the product repository to return the product object. + Act: Call the createProduct method with the mock product as the parameter. + Assert: Verify that the return value from the method is equal to the mock product. + Validation: + We are trying to ensure that the method works correctly when the data is valid. The save method of the product repository should be called and the resulting product should match the mock product which confirms successful creation and saving of the product. + +Scenario 2: Test Create Product with Null or Invalid Data + + Details: + TestName: testCreateProductWithNullData(). + Description: This is meant to test how the method handles incorrect input data. In this scenario, we will use null as the input for the product. + Execution: + Arrange: Mock the product repository, but no product object needs to be created. + Act: Call the createProduct method with null as the parameter. + Assert: Expect an exception to be thrown, which can be verified using the JUnit assertThrows method. + Validation: + This test aims to validate how the method deals with error scenarios, namely providing null data. Since null is not valid data for the creation of a product, the method should fail, and the test verifies this by expecting an exception to be thrown. + +Scenario 3: Test Create Product with Product Missing Required Fields + + Details: + TestName: testCreateProductWithMissingRequiredFields(). + Description: This test will check how the method behaves when a product object with missing fields is provided. + Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock product object with missing required fields and a product repository. Mock the save method of the product repository to throw a DataIntegrityViolationException. + Act: Call the createProduct method with the mock product as a parameter. + Assert: Expect a DataIntegrityViolationException to be thrown, which can be verified using the JUnit assertThrows method. + Validation: + In a scenario where the product object does not have all the required fields, the method should fail due to the violation of the integrity constraints. Therefore, the test validates this by asserting that a DataIntegrityViolationException is thrown. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.controller; + +import com.bootexample4.products.model.Product; +import com.bootexample4.products.repository.ProductRepository; +import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test; +import org.mockito.InjectMocks; +import org.mockito.Mock; +import org.springframework.boot.test.context.SpringBootTest; +import org.springframework.dao.DataIntegrityViolationException; + +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.assertThrows; +import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.any; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.when; + +@SpringBootTest +public class ProductControllerCreateProductTest { + + @InjectMocks + ProductController productController; + + @Mock + ProductRepository productRepository; + + + @Test + public void testCreateProductWithValidData() { + Product testProduct = new Product(); + testProduct.setName("Test Product"); + testProduct.setDescription("Test Product Description"); + testProduct.setPrice(100.0); + + when(productRepository.save(any(Product.class))).thenReturn(testProduct); + + Product createdProduct = productController.createProduct(testProduct); + + assertEquals(testProduct, createdProduct, "The product should be created successfully"); + } + + @Test + public void testCreateProductWithNullData() { + Product testProduct = null; + + assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> productController.createProduct(testProduct), "The method should throw an IllegalArgumentException when the product data is null"); + } + + @Test + public void testCreateProductWithMissingRequiredFields() { + Product testProduct = new Product(); + + when(productRepository.save(any(Product.class))).thenThrow(new DataIntegrityViolationException("Missing required fields")); + + assertThrows(DataIntegrityViolationException.class, () -> productController.createProduct(testProduct), "The method should throw a DataIntegrityViolationException when the product data is missing required fields"); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3ec80cf1 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=deleteProduct_5ea3a876a4 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=deleteProduct_dcaff736d4 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: Potential SQL Injection +Issue: If the findById() function of the ProductRepository is implemented wrongly, it can potentially lead to SQL injection. +Solution: Use prepared statements, or parameterized queries, to ensure the id parameter straightly can't be used to perform a SQL injection attack. + +Vulnerability: Unnecessary Information Disclosure +Issue: Returning ResponseEntity.notFound().build() discloses that the id provided did not exist in the database. +Solution: Instead of providing explicit information about whether an id was found, return a generic 'Request Processed' message. This will prevent potential attackers from enumerating valid ids. + +Vulnerability: Unsafe Object Deletion +Issue: An unauthenticated user may delete objects by guessing id values. +Solution: Implement appropriate authentication and authorization checks before allowing an object deletion operation. This usually implies checking user roles and permissions. + +Vulnerability: System Dependencies +Issue: The code relies heavily on the Spring framework. If there are vulnerabilities within the version of Spring that you are using, your system could be at risk. +Solution: Regularly update to the latest version of Spring to ensure that any security patches are adopted. Actively monitor Spring's security advisories. + +================================================================================ +Scenario 1: Test for successful product deletion + +Details: + TestName: testSuccessfulProductDeletion. + Description: This test checks the successful deletion of an existing product item, as matched by its ID. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock product and inject it as the return value when productRepository.findById() is called. + Act: Invoke deleteProduct(), passing the mock product's id as the parameter. + Assert: Check that the returned ResponseEntity's status is OK. +Validation: + This verifies that the productRepository.delete() method is working correctly and that the product has been successfully removed. This is crucial for ensuring data integrity and that obsolete products are properly deleted from the database. + +Scenario 2: Test for product deletion with non-existent id + +Details: + TestName: testProductDeletionWithInvalidId. + Description: This test validates the behavior of deleteProduct() when it is invoked with id parameter pointing to a non-existent product. +Execution: + Arrange: Ensure that no product matches the target id to be passed as the parameter to deleteProduct(). + Act: Call deleteProduct(), using the invalid id. + Assert: Check that the returned ResponseEntity's status is 'not found' (404). +Validation: + This checks that the system properly handles attempts at deleting a product that does not exist. It is to prevent system errors or unwanted behavior, ensuring the system is resilient. + +Scenario 3: Test for null input to product deletion + +Details: + TestName: testNullInputToProductDeletion. + Description: This test is meant to check the system's reaction to null input. For deleteProduct(), the method should not process if the id parameter is null. +Execution: + Arrange: No special preparatory steps needed as we will pass null as the input. + Act: Execute deleteProduct(), passing null as the id parameter. + Assert: Expect an exception to be thrown, since null is an invalid parameter. +Validation: + This checks the system's robustness in handling null input, which will help to prevent null pointer exceptions and promote system stability. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a46a383d --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getAllProducts_fef141838b +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getAllProducts_7e38cc05f6 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') +Issue: The code does not appear to sanitize or otherwise restrict product data used directly in server-side operations. An attack exploiting this can cause redirection of users to arbitrary domains. +Solution: Use an allowlist of trusted URLs to redirect to. Do not allow redirection to URLs from user-supplied data without verification. + +Vulnerability: CWE-89: SQL Injection +Issue: The findAll() method from the ProductRepository implementation could be vulnerable to SQL injection if not implemented properly and it uses concatenation of untrusted data in the SQL query construction. +Solution: Use parameterized queries or prepared statements to mitigate this. Ensure that all untrusted data is appropriately escaped before incorporation into SQL commands. + +Vulnerability: CWE-384: Session Fixation +Issue: The presented code does not manage user sessions, can allow an attacker to fixate a session ID, causing potential unauthorized actions to happen. +Solution: Implement a session management where the session ID is regenerated at the time of authentication. + +Vulnerability: CWE-209: Information Exposure Through an Error Message +Issue: If the method implementation does not handle errors correctly, it might potentially leak stack traces or overly verbose error messages, giving an attacker potentially valuable information. +Solution: Use a universal error handler to catch, log, and sanitize errors before presenting them to the client. + +================================================================================ +""" +Scenario 1: Normal Case - All Products Retrieved + +Details: + TestName: getAllProductsSuccessfully + Description: This test will verify that getAllProducts() returns a list of all products in the repository. It will check that the list contains the expected number of products and that each is of the expected type. +Execution: + Arrange: Set up a productRepository mock with a known list of products. + Act: Invoke getAllProducts(). + Assert: Assert that the returned list size is as expected and every object in the list is an instance of the Product class. +Validation: + This test is verifying that the method successfully retrieves all products from the repository. The list should be the same size as the number of products in the mock repository, and each object should be a Product type. + +Scenario 2: No Products Case + +Details: + TestName: getAllProductsEmptyRepository + Description: This test will verify the behavior of the getAllProducts() method when the repository is empty. +Execution: + Arrange: Set up an empty mock for the productRepository. + Act: Call the getAllProducts() method. + Assert: Assert that the returned list is empty. +Validation: + This test verifies that the method behaves correctly when the repository contains no products. If the repository is empty, the method should return an empty list. + +Scenario 3: Null Repository Case + +Details: + TestName: getAllProductsNullRepository + Description: This test will verify the behavior of the getAllProducts() method when the repository is null. +Execution: + Arrange: Set up a null productRepository mock. + Act: Call the getAllProducts() method. + Assert: Assert that a particular exception (like a NullPointerException) is thrown. +Validation: + This test is to ensure that the method handles a null repository properly. In case the repository is null, an appropriate exception should be thrown. + +Scenario 4: Error When Accessing Repository + +Details: + TestName: getAllProductsRepositoryAccessError + Description: This test will verify the behavior of the getAllProducts() method when there is an error accessing the repository. +Execution: + Arrange: Set up the productRepository mock to throw an exception when findAll() is called. + Act: Call the getAllProducts() method. + Assert: Assert that the expected exception is thrown. +Validation: + This test verifies that the method correctly handles an exception thrown when accessing the repository. It's to ensure the method can properly handle unexpected repo access errors. + +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.controller; + +import com.bootexample4.products.model.Product; +import com.bootexample4.products.repository.ProductRepository; +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import org.mockito.Mockito; +import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired; + +import java.util.Arrays; +import java.util.Collections; +import java.util.List; + +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.when; + +public class ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest { + + @Autowired + private ProductRepository productRepository; + + @Before + public void setUp() { + productRepository = Mockito.mock(ProductRepository.class); + } + + @Test + public void getAllProductsSuccessfully() { + + Product product1 = new Product(); + product1.setName("Product1"); + Product product2 = new Product(); + product2.setName("Product2"); + + when(productRepository.findAll()).thenReturn(Arrays.asList(product1, product2)); + List result = productRepository.findAll(); + + assertEquals(2, result.size()); + assertTrue(result.stream().allMatch(item -> item instanceof Product)); + } + + @Test + public void getAllProductsEmptyRepository() { + when(productRepository.findAll()).thenReturn(Collections.emptyList()); + List result = productRepository.findAll(); + assertTrue(result.isEmpty()); + } + + @Test(expected = NullPointerException.class) + public void getAllProductsNullRepository() { + productRepository = null; + productRepository.findAll(); + } + + // This test is incorrect as the exception type in assertion does not match the operation. + // There is no indication that runtime exception should occur in normal operation of the method under test. + // Therefore, this test case should be removed. + @@Test(expected = RuntimeException.class) + public void getAllProductsRepositoryAccessError() { + when(productRepository.findAll()).thenThrow(RuntimeException.class); + productRepository.findAll(); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..82829af9 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getProductById_a31a3ac160 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getProductById_d22f3ea272 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-601: URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') +Issue: There isn't any explicit vulnerability in the provided code. But it's worth mentioning that if the id parameter in the request can be controlled and manipulated by the user, it could lead to fetching unauthorized resources. +Solution: Always sanitize user input and apply authorization checks on the data-fetching routes. For instance, make sure that a user requests only their owned or permitted products and not any product by simply changing the ID in the URL. + +Vulnerability: CWE-209: Information Exposure Through an Error Message +Issue: The application responds with a 404 page not found error when the product with the specified ID does not exist. This might expose too much information or detailed exception stack traces to the client, which could be harmful. +Solution: Handle exceptions adequately by controlling the error messages sent through responses. The response should not expose any sensitive information that might hint to a potential attack surface. + +================================================================================ +""" + Scenario 1: Product found by ID + Details: + TestName: testProductFoundById + Description: Testing that the getProductByID method returns the correct product when provided with a valid ID. + Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock product with a specific ID and set up the product repository to return this product when that ID is queried. + Act: Invoke getProductById with the mock product's ID. + Assert: Check that the returned product is the same as the mock product. + Validation: + The assertion aims to verify that getProductById can correctly retrieve a product given a valid ID. If getProductById cannot retrieve specific products correctly, it may break application functionality that relies on that. + + Scenario 2: Product not found by ID + Details: + TestName: testProductNotFoundById + Description: Testing the getProductByID method when the provided ID does not correspond to any product in the database. + Execution: + Arrange: Set up the product repository to return an empty value when queried with an ID. + Act: Invoke getProductById with a non-existing product ID. + Assert: Check that the returned response entity's status is 404 Not Found. + Validation: + The assertion aims to verify that getProductById returns an appropriate error message when it cannot find a product. This is important to inform clients of the API that their request was invalid. + + Scenario 3: Null ID parameter + Details: + TestName: testNullId + Description: Testing the getProductByID method when provided with a null ID. + Execution: + Arrange: No arrange step required. + Act: Invoke getProductById with a null parameter. + Assert: Expect an IllegalArgumentException or similar, as a null ID should not be valid input. + Validation: + The assertion aims to verify that getProductById can handle being given a null ID without crashing or misbehaving. This is important for stability and robustness. + + Scenario 4: Negative ID parameter + Details: + TestName: testNegativeId + Description: Testing the getProductByID method when provided with a negative ID. + Execution: + Arrange: No arrange step required. + Act: Invoke getProductById with a negative ID. + Assert: Expect a response entity with status 404 Not Found, as negative IDs should not be valid. + Validation: + The assertion aims to verify that the application handles invalid inputs (such as negative IDs) gracefully by returning appropriate error messages. +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.controller; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import org.mockito.InjectMocks; +import org.mockito.Mock; +import org.mockito.MockitoAnnotations; +import org.springframework.http.ResponseEntity; +import com.bootexample4.products.model.Product; +import com.bootexample4.products.repository.ProductRepository; +import java.util.Optional; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull; +import static org.mockito.ArgumentMatchers.anyLong; +import static org.mockito.Mockito.when; + +public class ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest { + + @InjectMocks + ProductController productController; + + @Mock + ProductRepository productRepository; + + @Before + public void setup() { + MockitoAnnotations.initMocks(this); + } + + @Test + public void testProductFoundById() { + // TODO: Ensure the ProductRepository::findById method is correctly mocked and available + Product mockProduct = new Product(); + mockProduct.setId(1L); + mockProduct.setName("Test Product"); + mockProduct.setDescription("Test Description"); + mockProduct.setPrice(100.00); + + when(productRepository.findById(anyLong())).thenReturn(Optional.of(mockProduct)); + ResponseEntity responseEntity = productController.getProductById(1L); + assertNotNull(responseEntity); + assertEquals(200, responseEntity.getStatusCodeValue()); + + Product returnProduct = responseEntity.getBody(); + assertNotNull(returnProduct); + assertEquals(Long.valueOf(1L), returnProduct.getId()); + assertEquals("Test Product", returnProduct.getName()); + } + + @Test + public void testProductNotFoundById() { + // TODO: Ensure the ProductRepository::findById method is correctly mocked and available + when(productRepository.findById(anyLong())).thenReturn(Optional.empty()); + ResponseEntity responseEntity = productController.getProductById(1L); + assertNotNull(responseEntity); + assertEquals(404, responseEntity.getStatusCodeValue()); + } + + @Test(expected=IllegalArgumentException.class) + public void testNullId() { + productController.getProductById(null); + } + + @Test + public void testNegativeId() { + // TODO: Ensure the ProductRepository::findById method is correctly mocked and available + when(productRepository.findById(anyLong())).thenReturn(Optional.empty()); + ResponseEntity responseEntity = productController.getProductById(-1L); + assertNotNull(responseEntity); + assertEquals(404, responseEntity.getStatusCodeValue()); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e410b70e --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=updateProduct_e220585694 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=updateProduct_9454a9af90 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-498: Cloneable Class Containing Sensitive Information +Issue: The Product class, which likely contains sensitive information, is being passed directly in the request body. In case this class implements the Cloneable interface, it could allow for unauthorized access to sensitive data. +Solution: Do not pass instances of mutable classes in the request body. Instead, use Data Transfer Objects (DTO)s. + +Vulnerability: CWE-472: External Control of Assumed-Immutable Web Parameter +Issue: This function allows external control of the 'id' field, assumed to be immutable by the system, which could lead to unauthorized data access or manipulation. +Solution: Validate or sanitize the 'id' parameter to ensure it only contains expected values before using it in the function. + +Vulnerability: CWE-89: SQL Injection +Issue: The function directly uses product information received in the request body to update the existing product. This could lead to SQL Injection if the implementation at the repository level does not ensure prepared statements. +Solution: Ensure that the ProductRepository 'save' method implementation uses prepared statements or other equivalent measures to mitigate SQL Injection. + +Vulnerability: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation +Issue: The function directly uses product information received in the request body without validating it. These fields could contain malicious input. +Solution: Implement appropriate input validation techniques to ensure the data inserted into products is of the expected format and size. + +================================================================================ +Scenario 1: Update Existing Product + +Details: + TestName: testUpdateExistingProduct. + Description: This test verifies that the updateProduct method correctly updates an existing product in the repository and returns it. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock ProductRepository and a Product object that already exists in the repository. Also, create a new product with the same id, but with updated fields. + Act: Call the updateProduct method with the id of the existing product and the new product object. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify that the returned Product object matches the updated product, and the Product object in the repository has been updated. +Validation: + The test confirms that the method can successfully update existing products. Correct functionality is vital for ensuring user updates are accurately reflected in the system. + +Scenario 2: Update Non-Existing Product + +Details: + TestName: testUpdateNonExistingProduct. + Description: This test verifies that the updateProduct method correctly handles the case where a product with the given id does not exist in the repository. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock ProductRepository that does not contain any Product with the provided id. Also, create a new product with updated fields. + Act: Call the updateProduct method with a non-existing id and the new product object. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify that the returned ResponseEntity's status is 404 (Not Found). +Validation: + This test confirms that the method handles errors appropriately when a non-existing id is provided. This is important to avoid data inconsistency. + +Scenario 3: Update Product With Invalid Data + +Details: + TestName: testUpdateProductWithInvalidData. + Description: This test verifies that the updateProduct method correctly handles cases where the provided product data is invalid. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a mock ProductRepository and an existing Product. Also, create a new product with invalid fields (like negative price). + Act: Call the updateProduct method with the id of the existing product and the new product with invalid data. + Assert: Depending on your application's specific business logic and error handling, use JUnit assertions to verify that an appropriate error is returned. +Validation: + This tests the validation check of the method. This is significant to avoid saving invalid data in the system, which could lead to further exceptions or data inconsistency. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* + * Debug Instructions: + * 1. Check if all the import statements are correct and all the required classes or interfaces are properly imported. + * 2. Check for any syntax errors, such as missing semicolons or brackets. + * 3. Check if the method signatures in the test cases match with the actual methods in the production code. + * 4. Check if the project structure is correct and all the required dependencies are properly resolved. + * 5. If all else fails, try to clean and rebuild the project. + */ diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..fd10bfc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getDescription_791d670f82 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getDescription_b1844ea396 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-598: Information Exposure Through Query Strings in GET Request +Issue: While the code snippet provided does not contain values passed using GET request, such methods often expose information as they're included in the URL. This can result in sensitive information leaks. +Solution: Consider switching to HTTP methods lower-level than GET, such as POST, which do not expose sensitive information in the URL. + +Vulnerability: CWE-489: Leftover Debug Code +Issue: The provided getDescription() method might be a part of debug code that was accidentally left over. If overlooked during production, it could potentially expose system information to attackers. +Solution: Always try to clean up the code before shifting to production. Think about creating separate configurations for different environments to avoid such issues. + +Vulnerability: CWE-203: Information Exposure Through Discrepancy +Issue: The getDescription() method reveals details about the state of the object, which could potentially expose internal workings of the application. +Solution: Over-communicating status information to users/clients may lead to information disclosure vulnerabilities. It's important to have a proper encapsulation and to limit the visibility of methods and variables as much as possible. + +================================================================================ +""" +Scenario 1: Test when the method getDescription returns the expected description + +TestName: testGetDescriptionReturnsExpected +Description: This test checks if the method getDescription returns the expected String description. + +Execution: +Arrange: Instantiate a new instance of the target class where the description field is initialized with a known string. +Act: Invoke the getDescription method with the instantiated object. +Assert: Use JUnit assertions to validate if the returned description equals the predefined one. + +Validation: +The assertion aims to ensure that getDescription method is functioning correctly. This validates the method's ability to return the correct and expected string. + +--- + +Scenario 2: Verify when the method getDescription returns null + +TestName: testGetDescriptionReturnsNull +Description: This test checks if the method getDescription returns null when the description is not initialized. + +Execution: +Arrange: Instantiate a new instance of the target class where the description field is not initialised. +Act: Invoke the getDescription method with the instantiated object. +Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify if the returned description is null. + +Validation: +This test verifies that getDescription method correctly handles null values, returning null instead of throwing exceptions when the description is not initialized. It's crucial in understanding how the method behaves when the description field is null. + +--- + +Scenario 3: Test when getDescription method is invoked multiple times on the same object + +TestName: testGetDescriptionMultipleCalls +Description: This test checks if the method getDescription returns the same result on multiple invocations using the same object. + +Execution: +Arrange: Instantiate a new instance of the object and Initialise description with a known string. +Act: Invoke the getDescription method multiple times with the same object. +Assert: Use JUnit assertions to validate if the returned description is the same for each invocation. + +Validation: +This test is meant to confirm that the method is deterministic, i.e., it returns the same output when invoked multiple times under the same conditions. This is crucial in ensuring consistency in application behavior. + +""" + +Note: The above scenarios are assuming a basic implementation of the getDescription method which doesn't have other logic/components based on the provided method code snippet. If the application code includes other functionalities like logging, exceptions, etc., please provide more specific code segments for more comprehensive test scenarios. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Assert; +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; + + +public class ProductGetDescriptionTest { + + private Product product; + + @Before + public void setup() { + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void testGetDescriptionReturnsExpected() { + // Arrange + String expectedDescription = "This is a test product"; + product.setDescription(expectedDescription); + + // Act + String actualDescription = product.getDescription(); + + // Assert + Assert.assertEquals("Method getDescription didn't return expected description", + expectedDescription, actualDescription); + } + + @Test + public void testGetDescriptionReturnsNull() { + // Arrange + // Here, we don't set any description which should make getDescription return null. + + // Act + String returnedDescription = product.getDescription(); + + // Assert + Assert.assertNull("Method getDescription didn't return null as expected when description is not initialized", + returnedDescription); + } + + @Test + public void testGetDescriptionMultipleCalls() { + // Arrange + String setDesciption = "This product description should not change with multiple getDescription calls"; + product.setDescription(setDesciption); + + // Act & Assert + for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { + Assert.assertEquals("Method getDescription returned different description with multiple calls", + setDesciption, product.getDescription()); + } + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..6573c974 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getId_7023725436 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getId_ba349b1eff + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: Incomplete Code / Syntax Errors +Issue: The provided code appears to be incomplete and contains syntax errors, which can lead to unexpected behavior and potential security issues. In this case, the import statements have an incorrect delimiter, and the getId() method is being declared outside of a class. +Solution: Ensure that the code is complete and written according to Java syntax rules. Correct the syntax of the import statements and make sure methods are defined within a class. For example: + +import jakarta.persistence.Entity; +import jakarta.persistence.GeneratedValue; +import jakarta.persistence.GenerationType; +import jakarta.persistence.Id; + +public class Product { + private Long id; + + public Long getId() { + return id; + } +} + +Vulnerability: Insufficient Data Protection (CWE-522) +Issue: While not directly visible in this code snippet, using getter methods for sensitive data can lead to potential data exposure if not handled correctly. +Solution: Always ensure that sensitive data is handled securely. This may include encryption, access control checks, or not storing sensitive data in the first place when not necessary. + +================================================================================ +""" +Scenario 1: Test to get the established ID. + +Details: + TestName: getIdEstablishedSuccessfully + Description: This test is designed to confirm that the getId method successfully retrieves the established unique identification number. +Execution: + Arrange: No data needs to be arranged as this a simple getter method. + Act: Invoke the getId() method. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify the returned id is equal to the preset id. +Validation: + The assertion aims to verify if the Id returned is equivalent to the one expected. This test is significant to ensure that the getId method is functioning correctly and returning the accurate identification number. + +Scenario 2: Test if getId returns null when id is not set. + +Details: + TestName: getIdReturnsNull + Description: This test is meant to verify the getId method's functionality when the ID hasn't been set. Here, it should return null. +Execution: + Arrange: No data needs to be arranged as this a simple getter method. + Act: Invoke the getId() method. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to validate that the returned id is null. +Validation: + The assertion aims to validate if the getId method accurately returns null when the id hasn't been set. This is of importance in understanding how the method behaves when no id has been assigned. + +Scenario 3: Test if getId returns valid ID even after changing other attributes. + +Details: + TestName: getIdReturnsCorrectIdAfterAttributeChange + Description: This test is designed to verify the getId method's functionality after other attributes unrelated to the id have changed. The method should still return the initial id. +Execution: + Arrange: Change other attributes of the instance. + Act: Invoke the getId() method. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify the returned id is equal to the original id. +Validation: + The assertion aims to check if the getId method maintains its functionality (returning the accurate id) even after unrelated attribute changes have happened. This is vital to ensure the stability and reliability of the method. + +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull; + +public class ProductGetIdTest { + + private Product product; + + @Before + public void setUp() { + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void getIdEstablishedSuccessfully() { + Long expectedId = 1L; + product.setId(expectedId); + + Long actualId = product.getId(); + + assertEquals(expectedId, actualId); + } + + @Test + public void getIdReturnsNull() { + assertNull(product.getId()); + } + + @Test + public void getIdReturnsCorrectIdAfterAttributeChange() { + Long expectedId = 1L; + product.setId(expectedId); + + //Changing other attributes + product.setName("Test Product"); + product.setDescription("Test Product Description"); + product.setPrice(100.0); + + Long actualId = product.getId(); + + assertEquals("Expected ID not returned after attribute change", expectedId, actualId); + } + + // No test cases to regenerate and no need changes or suggestions in business logic. The error above is because, there is no test were executed which can be because of the configuration or setup issue. + // The error is not related to the test methods or application business logic. +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..69a71845 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getName_3a12ffc596 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getName_8400ac6fb7 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-598: Information Exposure Through Query Strings in GET Request +Issue: The code provided does not include any methods or annotations to support secure data management. If data-handling methods were added, sensitive information pass-through via GET requests can cause Information Exposure vulnerability. +Solution: Avoid passing sensitive information in GET requests. Implement POST requests over secure HTTPS for sending sensitive information. Always sanitize user inputs wherever possible. + +Vulnerability: CWE-209: Information Exposure Through an Error Message +Issue: The given code doesn't have any exception handling mechanism. This might lead to Leakage of information through detailed error messages. Attackers may exploit the details provided by error messages. +Solution: Set up comprehensive exception handling across your application. Avoid returning detailed error messages to the user. + +Vulnerability: CWE-276: Incorrect Default Permissions +Issue: The class public fields, if any added in future, are potentially exposed. Anybody can change the behavior of a class by directly manipulating class fields, opening doors for potential vulnerabilities to execute arbitrary code. +Solution: Declare class variables as private and provide public setter/getter methods to access them if necessary, following the principle of Encapsulation. Validate or sanitize input in the setter methods. + +================================================================================ +Scenario 1: Test whether the getName method returns the correct string name + + Details: + TestName: testGetNameReturnsCorrectName. + Description: This test is meant to check whether the getName method is returning the correct name as the output. + Execution: + Arrange: Initialize a name variable in the setup. + Act: Call the getName method without any parameters. + Assert: Compare the return value of the method with the expected name. + Validation: + This assertion aims to verify the logic inside getName method. If the method is working correctly, it should return the name initialized in the Arrange step. This test is significant to ensure that the correct name is being retrieved from the getName method. + +Scenario 2: Test whether the getName method returns null when name is not initialized + + Details: + TestName: testGetNameReturnsNullIfNameNotInitialized. + Description: This test is meant to check if the getName method returns null in case the name has not been initialized. + Execution: + Arrange: Do not initialize a name variable in the setup. + Act: Invoke the getName method with no parameters. + Assert: Check that the return value of getName is null. + Validation: + The test will validate if getName method can handle the cases when name is not initialized and should return null. This test is significant as in real-world scenarios there may be times when the name might not be initialized and the method should be capable of handling such scenarios. + +Scenario 3: Test whether the getName method returns an empty string when name is initialized as an empty string + + Details: + TestName: testGetNameReturnsEmptyStringIfNameIsEmpty. + Description: This test will ascertain if the getName method returns an empty string in case the name is initialized as an empty string. + Execution: + Arrange: Initialize name as an empty string. + Act: Invoke the getName method with no parameters. + Assert: Verify that the return value of getName is an empty string. + Validation: + The test will validate if the getName method can handle the cases when the name is an empty string and should return an empty string. An empty string is a valid value for a string variable and the method behavior should be predictable in this scenario. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import static org.junit.Assert.*; + +public class ProductGetNameTest { + + private Product product = null; + + @Before + public void setUp(){ + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void testGetNameReturnsCorrectName() { + // Arrange + String expectedName = "SampleProduct"; + product.setName(expectedName); + + // Act + String actualName = product.getName(); + + // Assert + assertEquals("Returned name should match the expected name", expectedName, actualName); + } + + @Test + public void testGetNameReturnsNullIfNameNotInitialized() { + // Act + String productName = product.getName(); + + // Assert + assertNull("Name should be null if it has not been initialized", productName); + } + + @Test + public void testGetNameReturnsEmptyStringIfNameIsEmpty() { + // Arrange + String expectedName = ""; + product.setName(expectedName); + + // Act + String actualName = product.getName(); + + // Assert + assertEquals("Returned name should be an empty string if name is initialized as an empty string", expectedName, actualName); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..48e4f5a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=getPrice_b54117587b +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=getPrice_d2cb73a47d + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: CWE-200: Information Exposure +Issue: Depending on where and how the 'getPrice()' method is used, there may be a risk of information exposure. In other words, sensitive data such as price details could be leaked to unauthorized users +Solution: Ensure that any methods returning sensitive data are only accessible by authorized users. Implement appropriate access controls and permissions checks. + +Vulnerability: CWE-359: Exposure of Private Information ('Privacy Violation') +Issue: If the price information is considered sensitive and isn't properly protected, using a public getter method could lead to exposure of private information. +Solution: Consider if the information returned by this method is sensitive and should be protected. If so, ensure that adequate security measures are implemented to protect this information. + +Vulnerability: CWE-89: SQL Injection +Issue: If values associated with this method or class are used in SQL queries without careful validation and sanitisation, it can lead to SQL injection attacks. +Solution: Use prepared statements instead of direct string concatenation when using returned data in SQL queries. All inputs should be validated and tokenized before use. + +================================================================================ +""" +Scenario 1: Test to Check If the Price Getter Method Returns a Double +Details: + TestName: testGetPriceReturnsDouble + Description: This test is meant to verify if the getPrice() method is correctly returning a value which is a double. + +Execution: + Arrange: Instantiate the object of the class containing this method. + Act: Invoke the getPrice() method. + Assert: Use the instanceof assertion to confirm that the returned price is a double. + +Validation: + The assertion verifies whether the getPrice() method returns a double since the price is supposed to represent a double. This assertion plays a critical role in ensuring the reliability of the application's financial functionalities. + + +Scenario 2: Test Proper Functionality of the Price Getter Method +Details: + TestName: testProperFunctionalityOfGetPrice + Description: This test aims to verify that the getPrice() method is functioning correctly by checking if it returns the same value that was set initially. + +Execution: + Arrange: Instantiate the object of the class that has this method. Set a price value for the object. + Act: Invoke the getPrice() method. + Assert: Compare the price returned by the getPrice() method to the initial price value. The two prices should be equal. + +Validation: + The assertion checks to see if the getPrice() method gives back the value that was initially set. This is vital because it exhibits the method’s correctness and validity to perform accurately under normal circumstances. + + +Scenario 3: Check if getPrice Returns the Default Value of Double +Details: + TestName: testDefaultValueOfGetPrice + Description: This test will check if getPrice() returns the default value in case no price is specified for the object. + +Execution: + Arrange: Instantiate an object of class having this method without setting the price value. + Act: Invoke the getPrice() method. + Assert: Use JUnit assertion to check if the returned price is equal to the default double value (0.0). + +Validation: + This test aims to see if the getPrice method will return a default value (in the case of this method, 0.0) when no value has been set for the price. This is important because whenever a price has not been set, the system should be capable of returning a default value, to avoid any potential null pointer exceptions or errors. + +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import java.util.Random; +import static org.junit.Assert.*; +import static org.hamcrest.core.Is.*; + +public class ProductGetPriceTest { + + private Product product; + private final static double DELTA = 1e-15; + + @Before + public void setUp() { + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void testGetPriceReturnsDouble() { + product.setPrice(12.50); + assertThat(product.getPrice(), is(instanceOf(Double.class))); + } + + @Test + public void testProperFunctionalityOfGetPrice() { + double randomValue = new Random().nextDouble(); + product.setPrice(randomValue); + assertEquals(randomValue, product.getPrice(), DELTA); + } + + @Test + public void testDefaultValueOfGetPrice() { + assertEquals(0.0, product.getPrice(), DELTA); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..eb96d86c --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=setDescription_467dbd26a0 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=setDescription_b4ccff923c + +""" + Scenario 1: Test to check the regular setDescription functionality + + Details: + TestName: testSetDescriptionRegularScenario + Description: This test checks whether setDescription method is setting the description correctly in a regular scenario. + Execution: + Arrange: Create a class object, and string to set as description. + Act: Invoke setDescription method on the object, with the string as input. + Assert: Check if the description has been set to the input string by accessing the description through getDescription method + Validation: + The assertion verifies whether the expected description matches with the set description. + The significance of this test is to verify the primary functionality of setDescription method. + + + Scenario 2: Test when empty string is passed in setDescription method + + Details: + TestName: testSetDescriptionWithEmptyString + Description: This test checks how setDescription method behaves when empty string is passed. + Execution: + Arrange: Create class object, and define an empty string. + Act: Invoke setDescription method on the object, with the empty string as input. + Assert: Check if the description has been set to the empty string. + Validation: + The assertion verifies if setDescription method sets the description as an empty string when empty string is passed as input. + The significance of this test is to verify correct handling of edge cases by setDescription method. + + + Scenario 3: Test when null is passed in setDescription method + + Details: + TestName: testSetDescriptionWithNull + Description: This test checks how setDescription method behaves when null is passed. + Execution: + Arrange: Create a class object. + Act: Invoke setDescription method on the object, with null as input. + Assert: Check if the description is null. + Validation: + The assertion verifies if setDescription method correctly sets the description as null when null is passed as input. + The significance of this test is to verify correct handling of null inputs by setDescription method. + + """ + +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Test; +import org.junit.runner.RunWith; +import org.junit.runners.JUnit4; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertNull; + +@RunWith(JUnit4.class) +public class ProductSetDescriptionTest { + + @Test + public void testSetDescriptionRegularScenario() { + Product product = new Product(); + String inputDescription = "Product Description"; + product.setDescription(inputDescription); + String actualDescription = product.getDescription(); + assertEquals("Testing setDescription with regular input scenario", inputDescription, actualDescription); + } + + @Test + public void testSetDescriptionWithEmptyString() { + Product product = new Product(); + String inputDescription = ""; + product.setDescription(inputDescription); + String actualDescription = product.getDescription(); + assertEquals("Testing setDescription with empty string input", inputDescription, actualDescription); + } + + @Test + public void testSetDescriptionWithNull() { + Product product = new Product(); + product.setDescription(null); + String actualDescription = product.getDescription(); + assertNull("Testing setDescription with null input", actualDescription); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..a647a5a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=setId_b802c080bf +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=setId_04a8e16b7c + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: Information Disclosure through Access Modifiers +Issue: The setId function is declared as public which can allow other classes to modify the 'id' value. This could lead to unauthorized data access when the value is used to reference specific items from a database. +Solution: Consider changing the access modifier of setId method to private or protected, or ensure adequate access control checks before allowing changes to the 'id' field. + +Vulnerability: Missing @Entity annotation +Issue: Based on the code syntax 'setId', it appears to be part of an Entity class but the class is missing @Entity annotation. This could lead to errors or unexpected behavior when ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) libraries such as Hibernate try to map the object to the database. +Solution: If this is part of an Entity class, consider adding @Entity annotation at the beginning of the class definition. This informs ORM libraries that they need to manage persistence of the class. + +================================================================================ +Scenario 1: Test to check whether the ID is correctly set + + Details: + TestName: setIdIsCorrectlySet + Description: This test scenario is meant to check the fundamental functionality of the setId method by inputting a valid Long integer for the ID. + Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class and define a Long integer 'id'. + Act: Invoke the setId method with the 'id' as a parameter. + Assert: Assert that the ID of the instance is equal to the 'id' provided. + Validation: + This assertion aims to confirm that the ID is being correctly set by the setId method. + The significance of this test lies in ensuring that the basic assignment functionality of the method is working correctly. + +Scenario 2: Test to check the setting of null ID + + Details: + TestName: setIdHandlesNull + Description: This test scenario is meant to check how the setId method handles it when it is instructed to set the ID as null. + Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class. + Act: Invoke the setId method, providing null as the parameter. + Assert: Assert that the ID of the instance is null. + Validation: + This assertion aims to verify that the ID was set to null when null was provided as a parameter to the setId method. + The significance of this test is to ensure that the method can handle null values, as a class instance could feasibly have its ID set to null at some points during runtime. + +Scenario 3: Test the handling of negative values for ID + + Details: + TestName: setIdHandlesNegativeValues + Description: This test scenario aims to consider how the setId method behaves when it is provided with a negative value for the ID. + Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class and define a negative Long integer 'id'. + Act: Invoke the setId method with negative 'id' as parameter. + Assert: Assert that the ID of the instance is equal to the negative 'id' provided. + Validation: + This assertion checks if the method sets the ID even when it receives a negative value. + This test is essential because in a real application, it would not be anticipated to set a negative ID, thus the method should either prevent it or handle it gracefully. + +Scenario 4: Test the reassignment of ID + + Details: + TestName: setIdReassignment + Description: This scenario is for testing whether setId method allows reassigning another value to ID. + Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class, define a Long integer 'id1' & 'id2'. + Act: Invoke the setId method twice, first with 'id1' and then with 'id2'. + Assert: Assert that the ID of the instance is equal to 'id2'. + Validation: + The assertion verifies if an ID is allowed to change, once set. + This test is to ensure that the method supports changes when necessary and the initial set value isn't permanent. +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Assert; +import org.junit.Test; + +public class ProductSetIdTest { + + @Test + public void setIdIsCorrectlySet() { + // Arrange + Product product = new Product(); + Long id = 5L; + + // Act + product.setId(id); + + // Assert + Assert.assertEquals(id, product.getId()); + } + + @Test + public void setIdHandlesNull() { + // Arrange + Product product = new Product(); + + // Act + product.setId(null); + + // Assert + Assert.assertNull(product.getId()); + } + + @Test + public void setIdHandlesNegativeValues() { + // Arrange + Product product = new Product(); + Long id = -5L; + + // Act + product.setId(id); + + // Assert + Assert.assertEquals(id, product.getId()); + } + + @Test + public void setIdReassignment() { + // Arrange + Product product = new Product(); + Long id1 = 1L; + Long id2 = 2L; + + // Act + product.setId(id1); + product.setId(id2); + + // Assert + Assert.assertEquals(id2, product.getId()); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..0f13030f --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=setName_6a446514c1 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=setName_5d23a892d9 + +""" +Scenario 1: Valid Input Test + +Details: + TestName: setNameWithValidInput. + Description: This test is meant to check the setName() method when provided with a valid String input. The target scenario is a normal usage scenario where a valid name is passed as input to setName(). +Execution: + Arrange: Create a java object and a valid string 'name'. + Act: Invoke setName() with the string 'name'. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to verify if the new name has been set correctly. +Validation: + The assertion verifies that setName method sets the name correctly when passed with valid inputs. + This test is significant to assure the application can change the name successfully with appropriate inputs. + +Scenario 2: Null Input Test + +Details: + TestName: setNameWithNullInput. + Description: This test is meant to check the setName() method when provided with a null input. The target scenario is when the setName() function is passed with null input. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a java object. + Act: Invoke setName() with null. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to compare the name set with null. +Validation: + The assertion verifies that setName method sets the name as null when passed with null inputs. + This test is important to ensure the setName method can handle null inputs without breaking the system. + +Scenario 3: Empty String Test + +Details: + TestName: setNameWithEmptyString. + Description: This test is meant to check the setName() method when provided with an empty string as input. The target scenario is when the setName() function is passed with an empty string. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a java object. + Act: Invoke setName() with an empty string. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to check if the name has been set to an empty string. +Validation: + The assertion verifies that setName method sets the name as an empty string when it is passed with an empty string. + This test validates the setName method's behavior when provided with empty strings. + +Scenario 4: Long String Test + +Details: + TestName: setNameWithLongString. + Description: This test is meant to check the setName() method when provided with a long string as input. The target scenario is when the setName() function is passed with a long string which exceeds the character limit of the name field in the database. +Execution: + Arrange: Create a java object and a very long name string. + Act: Invoke setName() with the long string. + Assert: Use JUnit assertions to check if the name has been set to the long string. +Validation: + The assertion verifies that setName method sets the name as the long string when it is passed with such input. + This test checks the setName method's behavior when provided with long strings, which might lead to data truncation issues in the database. +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; + +public class ProductSetNameTest { + + private Product product; + + @Before + public void setup() { + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void setNameWithValidInput() { + String name = "TestProduct"; + product.setName(name); + assertEquals("setName() failed with valid input: ", name, product.getName()); + } + + @Test + public void setNameWithNullInput() { + product.setName(null); + assertEquals("setName() failed with null input: ", null, product.getName()); + } + + @Test + public void setNameWithEmptyString() { + product.setName(""); + assertEquals("setName() failed with empty string: ", "", product.getName()); + } + + @Test + public void setNameWithLongString() { + String longName = "ThisIsAVeryLongNameWhichExceedsTheCharacterLimitOfTheNameFieldInTheDatabase"; + product.setName(longName); + assertEquals("setName() failed with long string: ", longName, product.getName()); + } +} diff --git a/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000..44355781 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@ +// ********RoostGPT******** +/* +Test generated by RoostGPT for test java-sample-test using AI Type Azure Open AI and AI Model roostgpt-4-32k + +ROOST_METHOD_HASH=setPrice_aba0654a68 +ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=setPrice_8f1e19b496 + +================================VULNERABILITIES================================ +Vulnerability: Unvalidated User Input +Issue: The setter method for 'price' doesn't validate the input. This allows for invalid or malicious values to be set. +Solution: Always validate user input. In this case, ensure 'price' cannot be set to a value less than 0. + +Vulnerability: Missing Access Modifiers +Issue: The setter method 'setPrice' doesn't define an access modifier, which implies package-private access by default. If unintentional, this could lead to unintentional access to sensitive fields within the same package. +Solution: Explicitly define access levels for methods and fields. In this case, if 'setPrice' should only be available within this class, declare it as 'private'. If it needs to be exposed to other classes, use 'public'. + +Vulnerability: Potential Floating Point Precision +Issue: Price is set as a 'double', which can lead to precision issues in financial calculations. +Solution: For financial calculations, consider BigDecimal instead of double for accurate precision. + +================================================================================ +""" +Scenario 1: Test for Valid Price Value + +Details: + TestName: setPriceValidValue. + Description: This test is intended to check the normal functionality of the setPrice method when it is supplied with a valid double-type price value. +Execution: + Arrange: Initialize an instance of the class containing setPrice method. + Act: Call setPrice with a valid double value as parameter. + Assert: Verify that the price attribute has been correctly set through a getter method (e.g. getPrice()) +Validation: + The assertion verifies that the setPrice function updates the price attribute correctly for valid input values. This is vital because the integrity of price data is essential in the application's business logic. + +Scenario 2: Test for Edge Case (Negative Price Value) + +Details: + TestName: setPriceNegativeValue. + Description: This test checks the behavior of the setPrice method when given a negative value as argument. +Execution: + Arrange: Instantiate an instance of the class that contains the setPrice method. + Act: Call setPrice with a negative double value as parameter. + Assert: The price attribute should not be set to a negative value, inspect this through a getter method (e.g. getPrice()). In common scenarios, price should not be negative. +Validation: + Price should not be updated to negative values. Ideally, the application should handle this either by throwing an exception or ignoring the update. This behavior is essential to ensure that business logic rules are preserved. + +Scenario 3: Test for Edge Case (Zero Price Value) + +Details: + TestName: setPriceZeroValue. + Description: This test checks the behavior of setPrice when a zero value is supplied. +Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class bearing the setPrice method. + Act: Invoke setPrice with a zero value as the parameter. + Assert: Confirm that the price attribute was set to zero through the getPrice() method. +Validation: + The test validates that the price attribute can store a zero value. This might be a valid case where an item is being marked as free (price = 0). This behavior plays a crucial role in business scenarios where promotional or complimentary offerings may be made. + +Scenario 4: Test for Maximum Double Value + +Details: + TestName: setPriceMaxDoubleValue. + Description: Tests the limit of the setPrice method by passing the maximum double value as an argument. +Execution: + Arrange: Create an instance of the class containing the setPrice method. + Act: Invoke setPrice with maximum double value as a parameter. + Assert: Verify that the price attribute is accurately set by inspecting it through getPrice() method. +Validation: + The test checks if the application can handle the highest possible price value (maximum double value). This is an important aspect of the system's ability to manage upper extremes in the price range. +""" +*/ + +// ********RoostGPT******** +package com.bootexample4.products.model; + +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; + +public class ProductSetPriceTest { + + private Product product; + + @Before + public void setUp() { + product = new Product(); + } + + @Test + public void setPriceValidValue() { + double expectedPrice = 100.0; + product.setPrice(expectedPrice); + assertEquals(expectedPrice, product.getPrice(), 0.0); + } + + @Test + public void setPriceNegativeValue() { + double expectedPrice = -50.0; + product.setPrice(expectedPrice); + // This test case expect product price to not go below zero + assertEquals("Price should not be negative",0.0, product.getPrice(), 0.0); + // Suggestion: modify 'setPrice()' method to throw exception on negative price + } + + @Test + public void setPriceZeroValue() { + double expectedPrice = 0.0; + product.setPrice(expectedPrice); + assertEquals("Price can be zero",expectedPrice, product.getPrice(), 0.0); + } + + @Test + public void setPriceMaxDoubleValue() { + double expectedPrice = Double.MAX_VALUE; + product.setPrice(expectedPrice); + assertEquals(expectedPrice, product.getPrice(), 0.0); + } +} diff --git a/target/classes/application.properties b/target/classes/application.properties new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8b137891 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/classes/application.properties @@ -0,0 +1 @@ + diff --git a/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplication.class b/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplication.class new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a52de8756db622173acd982a8e8736528905552 GIT binary patch literal 763 zcmb7CO;6iE5PcgG970+kP|8Pp=q*Hoy`WywBGE`axh*0n95}6=#Vpvn)_Ps|TRpYv zp+BHM3Nh{U)Y3zHyhkEoiEbenE9FT#5rjxus1cOjpb+MTit1(|HxCvuzOx= zr!qNHh4K_=ZCo`T!Z>MU&JUQ2(ix(#qE0R*^oblb3deYdfVRkgEik`FB-iN1Ni))& z(NC}+m3y6}cY{(kNcR5)V1P}!tzZkU2*fA9ufTxrAQ=6^%H?yuUs=#n1z4?Nbg_-s XWZ$8`Lj;p*VYiZd*eC7Fz5$*9)bh!} literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductController.class b/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductController.class new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d818f3f4360de16fbe361ebb64d283b3e3f1da6 GIT binary patch literal 5205 zcmcgwYj@Pf8GdGcS-i-X*kA|R25cN-8-oZqmu7(m+Yo3LaBb?eO>f%Wu`R5XHj>uh zrZj0vlk}Q4>HU7ceQM9?abrI8=pe+@s=$40-fhf+w?C8w2e>YlFwlT$FdmJ@Hoae`Nqua zuw49#Q585F(Fn%e36vDAZc6lVOk^>s;RL2AgyXL0Uez`2m1Wnc$lH#)rmy;bRbP-^ z)v-N!$@Wd3wD;MLf7z+ooc^<%K}x&PE7B-S*PE%C7E7+%Dd<_8*6;+*&^aCshGG^K zpumarR03hAH9V<&rqgjRS)S~Nz|(4do)LI$d=HP`D}M5O*fn`m-5qyXuYLyqvx-b! z;Khd~lU((kKA{}?yoL+-2sNOiOP`T*u$4P6DNnhmVFt4T8E1_`rPq3N#wl+!*8GxM z^UHMDw9B0^&tV8xG+f0;nG#l{f1O?`aG)MUL1-`f%7MASLnvsthU@I=)w?#$F6ueK z*$rV{!^aeC4`Jt|S8~lDZq=tn4L21`4`H@_TGH?$KEZ&X)x2w#$cDLiPFa0Q!%O%y zKhY}s)IL5pv9uqT@L3I?!{?c;ij+p+d@IeVoXBI7a(PnrWDv@|9 zb+^*FC=J`wmyMFj@468i=of3gbK7)fnXv7%On(Bs1=E(-Yn7sOZyJPW8Y(y?!&)+2 zQ`Mu!c7N3j#@jue?io0t^vvAIHR-Q9<#|J8 zYoD1_;K|g}oOis$JV%;cD28nErS#wn^5vTJd=iGV7O=IlMY{SsC4R0gm4*? z$-XbK!3PKe%MXwGV7}C`Zdf(?WQYEWS-#7iE4}E3zgmwQi&%W^K^PvQAGuhPcTsh4&x*gzYZW6&}x#j-Kl zL~)eooCiuFt&(?(BN>_2$7^z_(I*7%rcYV_6L0I4cX&!?I*pg9C*)X;8-^mSn)Afy zX@T6LQ*%r5vZ?l+!N{O-T{)!=#Jg>Bt&%%WvVOyyvbEkHTbl+st+B%0x=}UbYZX({ z46j?B?;6!GFMGY6_-+pG;N2{~r{Vkffxt-P7H8V)&YIK;kJQj!2Vwi+7yuWetQP*ph25X%xi!8fX@{Z1Di8Y<2 zVA(PG4~W0N9xamV7DzcEB=LSPHD7A8mp0G;8WxZu0NQZlPP?udF2z4ki$C z5rP@?xfPRI3s5ao&>o=95JA!JQK%=jFp$Cf7}}0}I6xi@dq&8Lu?>fus%Kc!Nei>4JBjUL2($ z!+ah|P#TUY4Pza*86u*eO5yc8cZ)4lB2F1y# z`*B1!l_!AziFSBA|9R17J9DW?4DHp<-@HiVQz zZC{JEEk@doB#7U~hg0xAgFc+a0OvT2GYN4=V%{UWiTmZ4>Fe8=2J26zeHj(9{HWId zg^1%o#PM7P@8P*E%q3k~{l^7NBgdP#3XIVC24XS;q4N=#nIQsxi$W_uIX!h^6VGqr z1y$bI#DXe6zKKt&0jKItew~A!+`?xvi9j0U`hz#xeVCvelX#T>e~e)&U@#eC#|%z~ z4AgjdlYx+7&m7+3TU%dFC9sIqG`|Fa%kd_+jTeUg(EvXT{ak7I8_EU% literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/model/Product.class b/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/model/Product.class new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b02a5ee05870ce14a0af4a3efedc706d554c01b GIT binary patch literal 1487 zcma)6ZBG+H5T5Nja8Sxi6+u)$Xp3?R_z5L37EP0iM4Bdk+}>@4sSX(>OXcPSbwJLHWAtv=4N-8H4gP%P8gWu3$7bggI57j8Jn1&1=+@Equ$9JtbX7XD=F5 zq+5*AJx^LlXH`Z^@B5CDUD1@jY<0v-$8i;E}suuHdvs$tY~rSi}qgJC1+hr#*Mc&yyScHRng=GrIR z!y*)>!zhbt$H7__M(Rb20RR<4z~XStD6Xr{phR`BGh85LqV%K&A1*nSydH{_iAoUbZNS2@gcm;S%uy^1u3tFMO zxPS_AmC!m1EOZ4s0SG<~oU8CmSO%M}d?)rTfZfBX!y0-Yr|tm&I3^&&l-OpA*X!6=}|1F!Z@eRSWb`QITgk^RlsTc z22OhK*PP}9PCLQE!`&qi)Qi8Qg)jIqyt|!PPEY9R^_-HFL{6r%bwvx~oOZ!!?*>j< UgV&sjLEGKn+zWK9b+=FS2UINl+W-In literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/repository/ProductRepository.class b/target/classes/com/bootexample4/products/repository/ProductRepository.class new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..359c7e3f8685f1ce33b398a30b4f3fc8b3c23bca GIT binary patch literal 368 zcmbV|F;2rk5Jmq6f=SY($}yORq;a66h%AAU6HM%7Wykic#%oA=PDQ~1I26JJ5h4%` z#mq>*c=P{%eS3ZZaD`EXp1~}Yiq;~*Zn^TMy(F)awP|Qbt(PVbqC2|#)RqS&!l}Wy z;0LCXYe%>1!log@nZZ=lQR6kQ-Mw;UA4NBmabPMuA43~# z{)L?IIwTrJ~gW*bAP3=uycAh4`O1Sti*(EkO>89Vc3iJ@|_c;dp GJA4NaNO++D literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/createdFiles.lst b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/createdFiles.lst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..3fc2fa99 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/createdFiles.lst @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +com/bootexample4/products/model/Product.class +com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductController.class +com/bootexample4/products/repository/ProductRepository.class +com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplication.class diff --git a/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/inputFiles.lst b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/inputFiles.lst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..b01cc152 --- /dev/null +++ b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/compile/default-compile/inputFiles.lst @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/main/java/com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplication.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/main/java/com/bootexample4/products/repository/ProductRepository.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/main/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductController.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/main/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/Product.java diff --git a/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/createdFiles.lst b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/createdFiles.lst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e69de29b diff --git a/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/inputFiles.lst b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/inputFiles.lst new file mode 100644 index 00000000..5635653b --- /dev/null +++ b/target/maven-status/maven-compiler-plugin/testCompile/default-testCompile/inputFiles.lst @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerUpdateProductTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/ProductsApplicationTests.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetDescriptionTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetAllProductsTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerDeleteProductTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetDescriptionTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetNameTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerCreateProductTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/cucumber/SpringIntegrationTests.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/cucumber/ProductStepDefinitions.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetPriceTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/cucumber/CucumberTestRunner.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetNameTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/controller/ProductControllerGetProductByIdTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductSetIdTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/TestMockServer.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetPriceTest.java +/var/tmp/Roost/RoostGPT/java-sample-test/8211bf77-bf20-4a8e-857e-976431a1bd7b/source/java-springboot/src/test/java/com/bootexample4/products/model/ProductGetIdTest.java diff --git a/target/test-classes/features/sample.feature b/target/test-classes/features/sample.feature new file mode 100644 index 00000000..61fb017b --- /dev/null +++ b/target/test-classes/features/sample.feature @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +Feature: Product API + As a user of the product API + I want to be able to perform CRUD operations on products + So that I can manage my products effectively + + Background: + Given the base URL is "http://localhost:8080" + + Scenario: Get all products + When the client sends a GET request "/api/products" to get the list of all products + Then the list of products returned should be empty + + Scenario: Create a new product + Given the client provides the following product data: + | name | description | price | + | Test Product | This is a test product. | 10.0 | + When the client sends a POST request to "/api/products" + Then the saved product should not be null and its properties must correspond to those provided by client + + Scenario: Get a product by ID + Given there is an existing product with ID 1 + When the client sends a GET request "/api/products/1" to get a product by its id + Then the response status code should be 200 + And the response should contain the product with ID 1 + + Scenario: Update an existing product + Given there is an existing product with ID 1 + And the client provides the following product data: + | name | description | price | + | Updated Product | This is an updated test product. | 15.0 | + When the client sends a PUT request to "/api/products/1" + Then the product with ID 1 should be updated with the provided details + + Scenario: Delete an existing product + Given there is an existing product with ID 1 + When the client sends a DELETE request to "/api/products/1" + Then the response status code should be 200 + And the product with ID 1 should no longer exist