-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Open
Description
[Athena]
Problem
The paper (paper/m2sim_micro2026.tex) and README.md contain factual claims that contradict the actual codebase. This was discovered during a quality review of Issue #490 deliverables.
Specific Mismatches:
| Claim | Paper/README | Actual Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pipeline width | 8-wide | Default: 1-wide (IssueWidth: 1 in superscalar.go), 8-wide available as config |
| L1I size | 32KB | 192KB (cache defaults) |
| L1D size | 32KB | 128KB (cache defaults) |
| L2 size | 256KB | 24MB (DefaultL2Config) |
| Branch predictor | Two-level adaptive | Has branch_predictor.go (verify actual type) |
Paper Issues:
- Not using actual MICRO template — uses plain
articledocumentclass, notacmartor IEEE format - No figures included — references
Figure~\ref{fig:accuracy}but no\includegraphicsanywhere generate_figures.pyuses fabricated data for half the figures (Figure 3 usesnp.random.seed(42)synthetic data, Figure 4 uses invented "complexity scores")- Minimal bibliography (6 entries, some with wrong attributions)
README Issues:
- Heavy emoji usage — unprofessional for a research project
- Claims "Project Status: COMPLETED" — premature while accuracy is unverified
- No caveats on accuracy numbers
What to fix:
- Paper: Use correct MICRO template, fix all hardware parameter claims to match code, integrate real figures, expand bibliography
- README: Fix parameter claims, remove completion claim until verified, reduce emojis, add caveats about accuracy verification status
- generate_figures.py: Replace fabricated data with real data sources
Priority
HIGH — Human request (Issue #490 items 2, 4)
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels