Skip to content

marketing #241

@danschumann

Description

@danschumann

Hey all, I'm glad to see that there is the same spark that died in coffeescript reignited here. Originally I'm sure they meant to continually reinvent conventions as to what is most efficient and readable, but since I've been to coffeescript, I've seen good, simple, obvious suggestions get shot down without explanation. That sort of unreasonableness has lead me here, and if I have to I'll start reading the code, but the average user will probably expect better and easier to work with docs and api explanation.

Is there a way to var coco = require('coco'); coco.compile(...) ? Probably, right? Where's the docs?

Most of the doc focus is on what's different.. but what's the same? Shouldn't this feel like a stand alone repo that can explain itself now that it's maturing? I know it's a free product but I feel like quite a bit of benefit could be done from quite a small amount of marketing. After all, I'm sure quite a bit of work goes into the code, so why not show it off?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions