-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
add error and steps #49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@kpj2006 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe CONTRIBUTING.md file was updated to include comprehensive documentation on debugging pre-commit hooks. A new Table of Contents entry was added, followed by a detailed section covering setup, common errors, troubleshooting solutions, bypassing hooks, running, updating, and help resources. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)
25-25: Verify the TOC link target matches the actual heading anchor.The TOC entry references
#debugging-pre-commit-hooks(line 25), but the heading includes an emoji prefix## 🔧 Debugging Pre-commit Hooks(line 229). Depending on the markdown renderer, the emoji may cause the auto-generated anchor ID to differ, breaking the link.Suggested fix: Either remove the emoji from the heading or update the link to match the actual anchor. Most markdown renderers strip emojis, so the link should work, but this is environment-dependent.
Also applies to: 229-229
486-486: Use more formal language in the closing statement.Line 486 uses informal language: "Don't fight them - fix the issues they find!" For consistency with the formal documentation style elsewhere in the file, consider a more formal phrasing such as: "Work with pre-commit hooks to maintain code quality by addressing the issues they identify."
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
CONTRIBUTING.md
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-12-28T01:17:41.264Z
Learnt from: kpj2006
Repo: AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo PR: 13
File: .pre-commit-config.yaml:38-47
Timestamp: 2025-12-28T01:17:41.264Z
Learning: In the Template-Repo repository, the detect-secrets pre-commit hook should be commented out because this is a template repo, and secrets baselines are project-specific and shouldn't be included in templates.
Applied to files:
CONTRIBUTING.md
📚 Learning: 2025-12-28T01:11:02.488Z
Learnt from: kpj2006
Repo: AOSSIE-Org/Template-Repo PR: 13
File: .pre-commit-config.yaml:18-27
Timestamp: 2025-12-28T01:11:02.488Z
Learning: In the Template-Repo repository, pre-commit-hooks should be pinned to known-stable versions rather than updated to the latest release, as the maintainer prefers version stability over bleeding-edge updates.
Applied to files:
CONTRIBUTING.md
🪛 LanguageTool
CONTRIBUTING.md
[style] ~486-~486: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ...intain code quality. Don't fight them - fix the issues they find! ## 🌟 Community ...
(FIX_RESOLVE)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
CONTRIBUTING.md
25-25: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
247-247: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
264-264: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
281-281: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
302-302: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
327-327: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
344-344: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
370-370: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
422-422: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CONTRIBUTING.md (2)
229-486: Excellent addition to contributor documentation.The new "Debugging Pre-commit Hooks" section is well-structured and comprehensive. The 10 error scenarios with clear solutions provide strong guidance for contributors. The section covers setup, common pitfalls, manual execution, and emergency procedures—all valuable for first-time contributors unfamiliar with pre-commit.
Key strengths:
- Clear error message + solution pattern for each scenario
- Actionable bash commands with explanations
- Links to external documentation and Discord support
- Addresses both automated fixes and manual intervention cases
Address the issues flagged in other comments (code fence language specifiers, detect-secrets alignment with template design, and tone formality) to complete this contribution.
299-322: The detect-secrets hook is currently enabled in.pre-commit-config.yaml(not commented out), making the troubleshooting guidance in CONTRIBUTING.md (lines 299-322) appropriate for the actual repository state. The section correctly advises users on handling detect-secrets failures and generating baseline files when needed. No changes are required.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
Addressed Issues:
Fixes #(issue number)
Screenshots/Recordings:
Additional Notes:
error handling
Checklist
We encourage contributors to use AI tools responsibly when creating Pull Requests. While AI can be a valuable aid, it is essential to ensure that your contributions meet the task requirements, build successfully, include relevant tests, and pass all linters. Submissions that do not meet these standards may be closed without warning to maintain the quality and integrity of the project. Please take the time to understand the changes you are proposing and their impact.
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.