Support high-bit-zero numbering on bits types#112
Draft
Conversation
…bits types Co-authored-by: AaronWebster <3766083+AaronWebster@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: AaronWebster <3766083+AaronWebster@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Support high-bit-zero numbering on bits
Support high-bit-zero numbering on Dec 6, 2025
bits types
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Many big-endian protocols (especially older RFCs like IP/TCP) number bits with bit 0 as the MSB. This adds a
bit_numberingattribute to support that convention.Changes
bit_numberingattribute: Accepts"Lsb0"(default) or"Msb0"onbitstypes and as module defaultBitBlockMsb0andOffsetBitBlockMsb0classes that transform user offsets to physical offsets viaphysical = total_bits - user_offset - sizeBitBlockMsb0when the referencedbitstype has[bit_numbering: "Msb0"]Example
This matches RFC 791's bit numbering convention directly.
Warning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
www.googleapis.com/usr/local/lib/node_modules/@bazel/bazelisk/bazelisk-linux_amd64 /usr/local/lib/node_modules/@bazel/bazelisk/bazelisk-linux_amd64 build //...(dns block)/usr/local/lib/node_modules/@bazel/bazelisk/bazelisk-linux_amd64 /usr/local/lib/node_modules/@bazel/bazelisk/bazelisk-linux_amd64 --version(dns block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
bits#81✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.