Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

⚡ Bolt: Optimize HistoryGrouper with O(1) loop comparisons

Optimizes the history grouping logic to improve performance on the history screen.

💡 What:

  • Pre-calculates startOfToday and startOfYesterday timestamps once outside the loop.
  • Replaces heavy Calendar operations inside the loop with simple long comparisons.
  • Removes redundant Calendar allocations.

🎯 Why:

  • HistoryGrouper.group was performing repeated Calendar date math for every item in the history list, which is computationally expensive (O(N * C)).
  • This was a potential source of frame drops when scrolling or loading large history lists.

📊 Impact:

  • Reduces grouping complexity to O(N).
  • Significantly reduces object allocation during grouping.

🔬 Measurement:

  • Verified correctness with a dedicated unit test covering Today, Yesterday, and Older date cases.

PR created automatically by Jules for task 5838464551610538086 started by @menny

Optimizes the history grouping logic to improve performance on the history screen.

💡 What:
- Pre-calculates `startOfToday` and `startOfYesterday` timestamps once outside the loop.
- Replaces heavy `Calendar` operations inside the loop with simple `long` comparisons.
- Removes redundant `Calendar` allocations.

🎯 Why:
- `HistoryGrouper.group` was performing repeated `Calendar` date math for every item in the history list, which is computationally expensive (O(N * C)).
- This was a potential source of frame drops when scrolling or loading large history lists.

📊 Impact:
- Reduces grouping complexity to O(N).
- Significantly reduces object allocation during grouping.

🔬 Measurement:
- Verified correctness with a dedicated unit test covering Today, Yesterday, and Older date cases.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants