Skip to content

Conversation

@YoshihitoAso
Copy link
Member

@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso commented Jan 30, 2026

πŸ“Œ Description

  • Update the Gunicorn dependency, and remove uvicorn
  • Use the Gunicorn standard ASGI worker.

βœ… Related Issues

None

πŸ”„ Changes

Dependency and configuration changes:

  • Upgraded gunicorn from version 23.0.0 to 24.1.0 in pyproject.toml.
  • Removed the uvicorn dependency from pyproject.toml, indicating a shift away from using Uvicorn as a Gunicorn worker.

Server startup and worker changes:

  • Deleted the custom AppUvicornWorker class and all related code from server.py, removing the custom Gunicorn worker implementation.
  • Changed the Gunicorn startup command to use the standard asgi worker class instead of the removed custom worker.

Version and documentation updates:

  • Bumped the project version from 25.12 to 26.3.

πŸ“Œ Checklist

  • I have added tests where necessary.
  • I have updated the documentation where necessary.

@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso marked this pull request as draft January 30, 2026 09:07
@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 30, 2026
@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso marked this pull request as ready for review January 30, 2026 09:30
@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage

Coverage Report β€’
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
app
Β  Β __init__.py10100%Β 
Β  Β main.py1352085%108–109, 113, 118–120, 149–150, 193, 205–207, 218–220, 223, 227, 232, 236, 378
TOTAL46983157696%Β 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
1538 0 πŸ’€ 0 ❌ 0 πŸ”₯ 12m 12s ⏱️

@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso changed the title feat: Update Gunicorn worker class to ASGI feat: Change Gunicorn worker class to standard ASGI Jan 30, 2026
@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso merged commit 301e969 into dev-26.3 Jan 30, 2026
13 checks passed
@YoshihitoAso YoshihitoAso deleted the gunicorn-asgi branch January 30, 2026 10:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants