Skip to content

Comments

Add folder enumeration signature for ransomware detection#527

Open
kevross33 wants to merge 2 commits intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-91
Open

Add folder enumeration signature for ransomware detection#527
kevross33 wants to merge 2 commits intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-91

Conversation

@kevross33
Copy link
Contributor

@kevross33 kevross33 commented Feb 23, 2026

Implements a signature for folder enumeration, targeting user directories that are commonly accessed by ransomware or wipers.

LockBit
image

ZOVWiper
image

DynoWiper
image

Implements a signature for folder enumeration, targeting user directories that are commonly accessed by ransomware or wipers.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevross33, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the system's ability to detect early-stage ransomware and wiper attacks by implementing a new signature. This signature focuses on identifying malicious patterns of folder enumeration within critical user directories, thereby providing an earlier warning mechanism against potential data encryption or destruction attempts.

Highlights

  • New Signature Added: A new Cuckoo signature named FolderEnumeration has been introduced to detect suspicious activity.
  • Ransomware/Wiper Detection: This signature specifically targets the systematic searching of multiple user directories, a common behavior observed in the pre-encryption phases of ransomware and wiper malware.
  • Targeted Directories and Threshold: The signature monitors access to common user directories such as Users, Documents, Desktop, Downloads, Music, Videos, Pictures, and AppData, triggering a detection if more than 10 unique folders matching these patterns are accessed.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • modules/signatures/windows/discovery_filesystem.py
    • Added a new signature for folder enumeration detection.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new signature to detect folder enumeration, a common behavior of ransomware. A medium-severity Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability was identified in the regex pattern. Additionally, improvements are suggested for making path matching case-insensitive for Windows, refining code style by removing a magic number and simplifying a return statement, and correcting an MBC classification code.


def run(self):
targeted_folders = set()
pattern = r".*(Users|Documents|Desktop|Downloads|Music|Videos|Pictures|AppData).*\\\*.*"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

security-medium medium

The regular expression on this line is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to the greedy quantifier .* which can lead to catastrophic backtracking. Additionally, Windows file paths are case-insensitive, and the current regex is case-sensitive, which could lead to missed detections on paths with different casing.

Suggested change
pattern = r".*(Users|Documents|Desktop|Downloads|Music|Videos|Pictures|AppData).*\\\*.*"
pattern = r"(?i).*?(Users|Documents|Desktop|Downloads|Music|Videos|Pictures|AppData).*\\\*.*"

evented = True
enabled = True
ttps = ["T1083"]
mbcs = ["B0002.001"]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The MBC code B0002.001 corresponds to 'Block Interrupts', a debugger evasion technique. This appears to be incorrect for a signature that detects file and directory enumeration. Please update it to a more appropriate MBC code, or remove it if one doesn't exist.

Comment on lines +43 to +46
if len(targeted_folders) > 10:
return True

return False
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

This if...return block can be simplified to a single, more concise return statement. Additionally, the threshold 10 is a magic number. It's recommended to define it as a class-level constant (e.g., TARGETED_FOLDERS_THRESHOLD = 10) to improve readability and maintainability.

        return len(targeted_folders) > 10

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant