Add ransomware extension hijacking detection signature#532
Add ransomware extension hijacking detection signature#532kevross33 wants to merge 1 commit intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @kevross33, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the system's ability to detect ransomware by introducing a new signature that identifies file extension and icon hijacking attempts. This proactive detection helps in recognizing malicious behavior, such as that exhibited by Lockbit, by monitoring specific registry modifications. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new signature to detect ransomware-like behavior, specifically file extension hijacking through registry modifications. The signature monitors for changes to DefaultIcon and UserChoice registry keys. My review focuses on improving the accuracy and maintainability of this new signature. I've suggested renaming the class and signature for better clarity and tightening the detection logic for UserChoice hijacking to reduce potential false positives.
| regkey_lower = regkey.lower() | ||
|
|
||
| is_icon_hijack = filepath_lower.endswith(".ico") and (r"\defaulticon" in regkey_lower or r"\applications" in regkey_lower) | ||
| is_userchoice_hijack = r"\userchoice" in regkey_lower |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition for is_userchoice_hijack is very broad. It flags any registry write to a key path containing \userchoice as long as the data being written is a string. This is likely to cause false positives, as legitimate actions like changing a default program also modify these keys. To improve accuracy, this check should be more specific. For example, you could verify that the registry value being modified is ProgId and potentially inspect its new value for suspicious patterns.
| class RansomwareSetsIcon(Signature): | ||
| name = "ransomware_sets_icon" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The class name RansomwareSetsIcon and signature name ransomware_sets_icon are misleading given the signature's functionality. It detects both icon changes and broader file-extension hijacking via UserChoice keys. To improve clarity and align with the filename and PR's intent, I suggest renaming them to RansomwareExtensionHijack and ransomware_extension_hijack respectively.
| class RansomwareSetsIcon(Signature): | |
| name = "ransomware_sets_icon" | |
| class RansomwareExtensionHijack(Signature): | |
| name = "ransomware_extension_hijack" |
Lockbit

BASTA (also showing other recent signatures detecting too for ransomware helping to ID it)
