Skip to content

Comments

Add ransomware extension hijacking detection signature#532

Open
kevross33 wants to merge 1 commit intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-96
Open

Add ransomware extension hijacking detection signature#532
kevross33 wants to merge 1 commit intoCAPESandbox:masterfrom
kevross33:patch-96

Conversation

@kevross33
Copy link
Contributor

@kevross33 kevross33 commented Feb 24, 2026

Lockbit
image

BASTA (also showing other recent signatures detecting too for ransomware helping to ID it)
image

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @kevross33, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the system's ability to detect ransomware by introducing a new signature that identifies file extension and icon hijacking attempts. This proactive detection helps in recognizing malicious behavior, such as that exhibited by Lockbit, by monitoring specific registry modifications.

Highlights

  • New Ransomware Detection Signature: Introduced a new Cuckoo signature, RansomwareSetsIcon, to identify potential ransomware activity by monitoring registry key modifications associated with file extension and icon hijacking.
  • Registry Key Monitoring: The signature specifically targets RegSetValueExA and RegSetValueExW API calls, checking for modifications to \defaulticon, \applications, or \userchoice registry paths, especially when an .ico file is involved.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • modules/signatures/windows/ransomware_extensionhijack.py
    • Added a new Cuckoo signature to detect ransomware-related file extension and icon hijacking.
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, etc.) has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new signature to detect ransomware-like behavior, specifically file extension hijacking through registry modifications. The signature monitors for changes to DefaultIcon and UserChoice registry keys. My review focuses on improving the accuracy and maintainability of this new signature. I've suggested renaming the class and signature for better clarity and tightening the detection logic for UserChoice hijacking to reduce potential false positives.

regkey_lower = regkey.lower()

is_icon_hijack = filepath_lower.endswith(".ico") and (r"\defaulticon" in regkey_lower or r"\applications" in regkey_lower)
is_userchoice_hijack = r"\userchoice" in regkey_lower
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

The condition for is_userchoice_hijack is very broad. It flags any registry write to a key path containing \userchoice as long as the data being written is a string. This is likely to cause false positives, as legitimate actions like changing a default program also modify these keys. To improve accuracy, this check should be more specific. For example, you could verify that the registry value being modified is ProgId and potentially inspect its new value for suspicious patterns.

Comment on lines +18 to +19
class RansomwareSetsIcon(Signature):
name = "ransomware_sets_icon"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The class name RansomwareSetsIcon and signature name ransomware_sets_icon are misleading given the signature's functionality. It detects both icon changes and broader file-extension hijacking via UserChoice keys. To improve clarity and align with the filename and PR's intent, I suggest renaming them to RansomwareExtensionHijack and ransomware_extension_hijack respectively.

Suggested change
class RansomwareSetsIcon(Signature):
name = "ransomware_sets_icon"
class RansomwareExtensionHijack(Signature):
name = "ransomware_extension_hijack"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant