Open
Conversation
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8272920017Details
💛 - Coveralls |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
StandardJS is a style guide, linter, and automatic code formatter for JavaScript, promoting consistency and preventing errors in coding. It enforces a strict set of rules and coding styles to improve readability and maintainability of JavaScript code. Developers use it to ensure their code follows community-adopted standards without needing to configure it.
StandardJS run output:
TerminalStandardOutput.txt
Screenshot of StandardJS run:
StandardJS timed:
ESLint timed:
StandardJS finished in 4.448s, while ESlint finished in 3.264s. This indicates ESLint as a more efficient process, which may be more suitable for CI environments where speed matters (ex. software developers in the industry may not have the patience for slower static analysis tools). While both processes were relatively fast, the speed difference may become more significant with larger project sizes.
However, StandardJS provided a long list of style issues, while ESlint reported to issues. This points to a significant difference in the rules or configurations used by each tool. StandardJS applies a predefined set of rules that enforce specific coding styles for JavaScript and best practices. This makes StandardJS more suited to enforce code consistency and readability, which can improve code quality and maintainability. In addition, since the rules are pre-configured, this makes StandardJS a convenient choice.
ESLint, on the other hand, is highly configurable. These detections may be possible with configuration, but StandardJS is more convenient in detecting such issues, since it requires no configuration. ESLint may be better suited for projects where style flexibility is crucial, or projects with less emphasis on coding style.