[WIP] GTest matcher integration

[DNKpp]

As with the "catch2-matcher-integration" experimental feature, it would probably be beneficial to add a native integration of the gtest matchers. Unfortunatly that seems to be more complicated.

The current state integrates the gtest matchers, but those are just a very small sub-set of all available matchers. Most of them are part of gmock, with an completetly different architecture. gmock seems to provide tools to unify both worlds, but gtest by itself is quite useless.
e.g. testing::MatcherCast, testing::SafeMatcherCast, testing::matches

Definitely more research required.

[codacy-production]

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation	Diff coverage
Report missing for 882f3bb1	✅ ∅

Coverage variation details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Coverage
Common ancestor commit (882f3bb)	Report Missing	Report Missing	Report Missing
Head commit (a969fc3)	933	927	99.36%

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details

	Coverable lines	Covered lines	Diff coverage
Pull request (#40)	0	0	∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

_{Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more}

Footnotes

1. Codacy didn't receive coverage data for the commit, or there was an error processing the received data. Check your integration for errors and validate that your coverage setup is correct. ↩

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.67%. Comparing base (1585ca2) to head (a969fc3).
Report is 8 commits behind head on development.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##           development      #40      +/-   ##
===============================================
+ Coverage        96.66%   96.67%   +0.01%     
===============================================
  Files               13       13              
  Lines              930      933       +3     
  Branches           285      285              
===============================================
+ Hits               899      902       +3     
+ Misses               7        6       -1     
- Partials            24       25       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11160832364

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 99.357%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 11160688607:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	927
Relevant Lines:	933

---

💛 - Coveralls