Skip to content

Conversation

@riteshsamala
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@riteshsamala riteshsamala self-assigned this Feb 28, 2020
Copy link
Member

@jonwetzel jonwetzel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The "dynamic" option is present in the variable node's type menu. Please remove it.

<input data-dojo-type="dijit/form/RadioButton" name="variableType" class="handleVariable" id="dynamicType" value="dynamic"/>
<label for="dynamicType">Dynamic</label>
</span>
</span> -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Go ahead and delete the code for this. We can always retrieve it from git if we need it later.

parameter: "parameterType",
dynamic: "dynamicType",
variableType: "variableType",
//dynamic: "dynamicType",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can delete this dynamic line too.

registry.byId(prevSelected+"Type").set('checked', false); */
var varTypeSel = registry.byId(this.controlMap.variableType);
varTypeSel.removeOption(varTypeSel.getOptions());
var varTypes = ["unknown","parameter","dynamic"];
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove "dynamic" here.

});
}

// reset the variablte type radio button labels
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As mentioned before, you can go ahead and remove the radio button code.

@riteshsamala
Copy link
Contributor Author

yes, will delete all the corresponding code and other commented out code before merging to master after the testing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants