Sea ice sensitivity to GMST - Calculate from observational datasets #4220
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Removed obs from Roach-style graphic (left description for reference). - Fed in model datasets from recipe differently to allow for obs having a different variable. To do: - Calculate and plot the obs. - Print the obs trend values.
Contributor
|
please give the PR a suitable title, when you have a minute (even if it's a draft) 😁 |
…-recipe-retry Attempt to fix error in Install
NParsonsMO
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
Questions:
|
…-sensitivity-recipe-retry' into 4095-add-observations-to-sea-ice-sensitivity-recipe-retry
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added capacity to calculate trends from observational datasets for plotting in Roach-style plot only (as Notz-style includes a "plausible" range that is beyond scope).
Observations are shown as squares.
Preprocessed data matches data sent from Lettie Roach for the datasets
But is different for datasets
Annual trend in siconc for dataset __is slightly different between this and Roach's figures, 0.01677... vs 0.01692....
Annual trends for GMST were taken as one average in Roach's plots, so will not be identical.
Direct sensitivities (such as plotted in the Notz-style plot) are calculated for each observational pair [as the calculation was already running to produce correlation coefficients], but are not shown in any plots (they are saved in the csv files though).
Description
Before you get started
Checklist
It is the responsibility of the author to make sure the pull request is ready to review. The icons indicate whether the item will be subject to the 🛠 Technical or 🧪 Scientific review.
New or updated recipe/diagnostic
New or updated data reformatting script
To help with the number of pull requests: