New package: TrustRegionReflective v0.4.2#149575
New package: TrustRegionReflective v0.4.2#149575JuliaRegistrator wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
JuliaRegistrator
commented
Mar 1, 2026
- Registering package: TrustRegionReflective
- Repository: https://github.com/oscarvanderheide/TrustRegionReflective.jl
- Created by: @oscarvanderheide
- Version: v0.4.2
- Commit: b908a4be857e88bae8b8cf97a095d656c45de0e8
- Reviewed by: @oscarvanderheide
- Reference: Register in Julia General registry oscarvanderheide/TrustRegionReflective.jl#1 (comment)
- Description: Solver suitable for large-scale, non-linear optimization problems with box constraints
- Release notes:
UUID: b2fb89f2-9639-4e52-b458-b5e2ad6f229e Repo: https://github.com/oscarvanderheide/TrustRegionReflective.jl.git Tree: e299c436a05369a8a9deca65dd854a46f0f90642 Registrator tree SHA: 50f504d641745716a5b3eabaf681d3a4937d2ae3
|
Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human. 1. New package registrationPlease make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines. 2. AutoMerge Guidelines are all met! ✅Your new package registration met all of the guidelines for auto-merging and is scheduled to be merged when the mandatory waiting period (3 days) has elapsed. 3. To pause or stop registrationIf you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add |
Since registered packages are intended to be useful to a wide audience, I would ask that you add some tests before continuing with the registration. Just refactoring out some piece of code and then "throwing it over the wall" without any further checks that it works correctly and is useable is less than ideal |
|
It was an outdated comment that has now been removed. The package contains tests of the solver being run on some (common) toy examples that run successfully. |
|
Great, looks good then! It would probably be a good idea to set up the typical [noblock] |