Skip to content

Conversation

@EwanC
Copy link
Contributor

@EwanC EwanC commented Feb 21, 2024

See #1066

The goal of this extension is to be able to update the parameters to memory operation commands in a command-buffer after the command-buffer has been finalized using the clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR entry-point defined by cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_dispatch.

@EwanC EwanC added the cl_khr_command_buffer Relating to the command-buffer family of extension label Feb 21, 2024
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the array_command_update branch 3 times, most recently from 62e7b7d to 2673582 Compare March 28, 2024 18:11
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the cl_khr_mutable_memory_commands branch from 82576f1 to c2e3f79 Compare March 28, 2024 18:23
Draft of `cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_memory_commands` based
ontop of KhronosGroup#1045
which updates `clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR` to pass configs
by an array rather than linked list.

The goal of this extension is to be able to update the parameters to memory
operation commands in a command-buffer after the command-buffer has been
finalized using the `clUpdateMutableCommandsKHR` entry-point defined by
`cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_dispatch`.
@EwanC EwanC force-pushed the cl_khr_mutable_memory_commands branch from c2e3f79 to 088995d Compare March 29, 2024 13:37
Co-authored-by: Kévin Petit <kpet@free.fr>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cl_khr_command_buffer Relating to the command-buffer family of extension

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New cl_khr_command_buffer_mutable_memory_commands extension

2 participants