Skip to content

Conversation

@cmccully
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

self.data *= value
else:
self.data *= value
self.uncertainty *= value

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intentional that there is no protection for the uncertainties for negative values if value is a scalar, unlike for the array case? (Cf. line 145)

Copy link

@captain-exoplanet captain-exoplanet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, my one comment need not prevent merging. Approved.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mgdaily mgdaily left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks reasonable. I think it would be a good idea to make sure we have good unit test coverage for these new cases, just to be sure that they do what we expect.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants