Skip to content

fix(ci): request @devs review until review conditions are fully satisfied#989

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
devs/JulianMaurin/fix/request-review-until-conditions-met/I8a004dd8b97ad77417fdc2b4fa64aecbb9c8f14f
Feb 25, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): request @devs review until review conditions are fully satisfied#989
mergify[bot] merged 1 commit intomainfrom
devs/JulianMaurin/fix/request-review-until-conditions-met/I8a004dd8b97ad77417fdc2b4fa64aecbb9c8f14f

Conversation

@JulianMaurin
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, the review request rule used #approved-reviews-by=0, which
stopped requesting @devs after the first approval — even when a second
approval was still needed. Now checks the actual review conditions
(DefaultReviewCond) so @devs keeps being requested until the requirements
are truly met.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 noreply@anthropic.com

@mergify mergify bot had a problem deploying to Mergify Merge Protections February 25, 2026 08:55 Failure
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Merge Protections

Your pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid.

🟢 📃 Configuration Change Requirements

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Mergify configuration change

  • check-success = Configuration changed

🟢 🤖 Continuous Integration

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • all of:
    • check-success=ci-gate

🟢 👀 Review Requirements

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • any of:
    • #approved-reviews-by>=2
    • author = dependabot[bot]
    • author = mergify-ci-bot
    • author = renovate[bot]

🟢 Enforce conventional commit

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.

Make sure that we follow https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

  • title ~= ^(fix|feat|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|build|ci|chore|revert)(?:\(.+\))?:

🟢 🔎 Reviews

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • #changes-requested-reviews-by = 0
  • #review-requested = 0
  • #review-threads-unresolved = 0

🟢 📕 PR description

Wonderful, this rule succeeded.
  • body ~= (?ms:.{48,})

@JulianMaurin JulianMaurin marked this pull request as ready for review February 25, 2026 08:55
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

🧪 CI Insights

Here's what we observed from your CI run for eb93f52.

🟢 All jobs passed!

But CI Insights is watching 👀

@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team February 25, 2026 08:57
…fied

Previously, the review request rule used `#approved-reviews-by=0`, which
stopped requesting @devs after the first approval — even when a second
approval was still needed. Now checks the actual review conditions
(DefaultReviewCond) so @devs keeps being requested until the requirements
are truly met.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Change-Id: I8a004dd8b97ad77417fdc2b4fa64aecbb9c8f14f
@JulianMaurin JulianMaurin force-pushed the devs/JulianMaurin/fix/request-review-until-conditions-met/I8a004dd8b97ad77417fdc2b4fa64aecbb9c8f14f branch from e61f097 to eb93f52 Compare February 25, 2026 10:07
@mergify mergify bot deployed to Mergify Merge Protections February 25, 2026 10:07 Active
@JulianMaurin JulianMaurin requested a review from a team February 25, 2026 10:22
@mergify mergify bot merged commit bfed848 into main Feb 25, 2026
11 checks passed
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Feb 25, 2026

Merge Queue Status

Rule: default


  • Entered queue2026-02-25 10:27 UTC
  • Checks passed · in-place
  • Merged2026-02-25 10:27 UTC · at eb93f52eadf078cbc886dce60db257a2583f83bb

This pull request spent 8 seconds in the queue, with no time running CI.

Required conditions to merge

@mergify mergify bot added the queued label Feb 25, 2026
@mergify mergify bot deleted the devs/JulianMaurin/fix/request-review-until-conditions-met/I8a004dd8b97ad77417fdc2b4fa64aecbb9c8f14f branch February 25, 2026 10:27
@mergify mergify bot removed the queued label Feb 25, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants