Support only built-in OS decoders/encoders. Remove any GPL code.

[EvanRuiz]

• Support only built-in OS decoders/encoders. Remove any GPL code. #94

• Broadway and X264 sources and references removed.
• Updated readme and added open source attributions.
• It may be easier to review each commit change set separately.
• Platform builds compile for: Windows, Mac OSX, iOS, Linux (Linux has another PR pending w/ compile fixes)
• Not tested: Android, Lumin, NVIDIA Jetson, Raspberry Pi, Hololens, Wasm

[SoylentGraham]

This kinda looks okay.

Not sure theres any use for a wasm build at all any more with webcodecs. Any webworker implementation that uses the wasm would be just passing VideoFrames around needlessly.

I wonder if theres any value in the API, hmm.

[SoylentGraham]

does the attribution file need to be specificcly uppercase for github, or can we make it consistent with everything else and be capitalised?

[EvanRuiz]

does the attribution file need to be specificcly uppercase for github, or can we make it consistent with everything else and be capitalised?

It looks like it isn't required to be all caps: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/22673

I checked the "allow edits by maintainers" - I don't mind if you make commit tweaks on the PR directly, based on your style preferences.

[SoylentGraham]

Looks like windows isn't compiling. Can be fixed seperately #98

[EvanRuiz]

Thanks for the tweaks and review. For Windows - I had tested the build of the windows library and test app - but looks like I didn't run the UWP project build, so didn't notice UWP had a linking error for HEVC.

[EvanRuiz]

PR for UWP windows build fix: #99

[EvanRuiz]

Not sure theres any use for a wasm build at all any more with webcodecs. Any webworker implementation that uses the wasm would be just passing VideoFrames around needlessly.

I wonder if theres any value in the API, hmm.

I also see the Build Wasm github action failing - with your above comment are you thinking to remove Wasm?

[SoylentGraham]

Not sure theres any use for a wasm build at all any more with webcodecs. Any webworker implementation that uses the wasm would be just passing VideoFrames around needlessly.
I wonder if theres any value in the API, hmm.

I also see the Build Wasm github action failing - with your above comment are you thinking to remove Wasm?

I'll just leave it in there for now as a stub.

I thought I fixed wasm on master...