Skip to content

Comments

chore(deps): update dependency @stylistic/eslint-plugin to v5.9.0#639

Merged
Octobob merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/eslint-stylistic-monorepo
Feb 21, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): update dependency @stylistic/eslint-plugin to v5.9.0#639
Octobob merged 1 commit intomainfrom
renovate/eslint-stylistic-monorepo

Conversation

@Octobob
Copy link
Member

@Octobob Octobob commented Feb 20, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
@stylistic/eslint-plugin (source) 5.8.05.9.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint-stylistic/eslint-stylistic (@​stylistic/eslint-plugin)

v5.9.0

Compare Source

Features
Bug Fixes
  • comma-dangle: check tsx file correctly (#​1127) (271da42)
  • comma-dangle: prevent crash when linting non-js files (#​1140) (4a96eae)
  • indent: ignore when source code is not ESTree (#​1139) (9e7f422)
  • no-extra-parens: don't report jsdoc type assertion by default (#​1100) (cfb6296)
  • object-curly-spacing: correctly handle object patterns with type annotations (#​1129) (5aaaec6)
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

@Octobob Octobob requested a review from a team as a code owner February 20, 2026 00:08
@Octobob Octobob force-pushed the renovate/eslint-stylistic-monorepo branch from f9d735b to f0b28cb Compare February 20, 2026 00:09
@Octobob Octobob merged commit 33edd50 into main Feb 21, 2026
8 checks passed
@Octobob Octobob deleted the renovate/eslint-stylistic-monorepo branch February 21, 2026 00:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants