[UT] Add GLM E2E tests for non-MTP and MTP

[Deleter-D]

Motivation

💡 If this PR is a Cherry Pick, the PR title needs to follow the format by adding the [Cherry-Pick] label at the very beginning and appending the original PR ID at the end. For example, [Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

💡 如若此PR是Cherry Pick，PR标题需遵循格式，在最开始加上[Cherry-Pick]标签，以及最后面加上原PR ID，例如[Cherry-Pick][CI] Add check trigger and logic(#5191)

N/A

Modifications

N/A

Usage or Command

N/A

Accuracy Tests

N/A

Checklist

• Add at least a tag in the PR title.
  • Tag list: [[FDConfig],[APIServer],[Engine], [Scheduler], [PD Disaggregation], [Executor], [Graph Optimization], [Speculative Decoding], [RL], [Models], [Quantization], [Loader], [OP], [KVCache], [DataProcessor], [BugFix], [Docs], [CI], [Optimization], [Feature], [Benchmark], [Others], [XPU], [HPU], [GCU], [DCU], [Iluvatar], [Metax]]
  • You can add new tags based on the PR content, but the semantics must be clear.
• Format your code, run pre-commit before commit.
• Add unit tests. Please write the reason in this PR if no unit tests.
• Provide accuracy results.
• If the current PR is submitting to the release branch, make sure the PR has been submitted to the develop branch, then cherry-pick it to the release branch with the [Cherry-Pick] PR tag.

[paddle-bot]

Thanks for your contribution!

[gongshaotian]

LGTM

[EmmonsCurse]

GLM_45 的两个测试 case 建议调整基准值及执行结果的存储路径名称。当前 glm45air 与之前的单卡用例存在路径冲突，建议在多卡场景下增加 _tp4 后缀进行区分，例如：glm45air_tp4 与 glm45air_mtp_tp4

[Deleter-D]

GLM_45 的两个测试 case 建议调整基准值及执行结果的存储路径名称。当前 glm45air 与之前的单卡用例存在路径冲突，建议在多卡场景下增加 _tp4 后缀进行区分，例如：glm45air_tp4 与 glm45air_mtp_tp4

之前的单卡是 fake 模型，相关单测已经移除了

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
⚠️ Please upload report for BASE (develop@955785e). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...model_executor/layers/moe/routing_indices_cache.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #6163   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage           ?   67.40%           
==========================================
  Files              ?      381           
  Lines              ?    49936           
  Branches           ?     7820           
==========================================
  Hits               ?    33661           
  Misses             ?    13814           
  Partials           ?     2461           

Flag	Coverage Δ
GPU	67.40% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.