Skip to content

Conversation

@dpanici
Copy link
Collaborator

@dpanici dpanici commented Jan 2, 2026

No description provided.

@dpanici dpanici added the easy Short and simple to code or review label Jan 2, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Memory benchmark result

|               Test Name                |      %Δ      |    Master (MB)     |      PR (MB)       |    Δ (MB)    |    Time PR (s)     |  Time Master (s)   |
| -------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------ | ------------------ | ------------ | ------------------ | ------------------ |
  test_objective_jac_w7x                 |    2.14 %    |     3.839e+03      |     3.922e+03      |    82.21     |       41.08        |       36.96        |
  test_proximal_jac_w7x_with_eq_update   |    1.41 %    |     6.504e+03      |     6.596e+03      |    91.79     |       167.45       |       162.40       |
  test_proximal_freeb_jac                |    0.27 %    |     1.314e+04      |     1.318e+04      |    36.10     |       84.23        |       82.92        |
  test_proximal_freeb_jac_blocked        |    0.53 %    |     7.482e+03      |     7.522e+03      |    39.53     |       73.52        |       73.51        |
  test_proximal_freeb_jac_batched        |    0.46 %    |     7.462e+03      |     7.496e+03      |    34.55     |       72.91        |       74.12        |
  test_proximal_jac_ripple               |    0.70 %    |     3.529e+03      |     3.554e+03      |    24.82     |       65.00        |       66.00        |
  test_proximal_jac_ripple_bounce1d      |    0.85 %    |     3.527e+03      |     3.557e+03      |    30.08     |       78.27        |       76.25        |
  test_eq_solve                          |    3.80 %    |     1.988e+03      |     2.064e+03      |    75.55     |       93.68        |       95.00        |

For the memory plots, go to the summary of Memory Benchmarks workflow and download the artifact.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.75%. Comparing base (c42d083) to head (1e7ec99).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2048      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.76%   95.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         102      102              
  Lines       28344    28344              
==========================================
- Hits        27143    27142       -1     
- Misses       1201     1202       +1     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
desc/magnetic_fields/_current_potential.py 99.60% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@dpanici dpanici requested review from a team, YigitElma, ddudt, f0uriest, rahulgaur104 and unalmis and removed request for a team January 2, 2026 21:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

easy Short and simple to code or review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants