Skip to content

Test/bids for invoice by status#475

Open
OluRemiFour wants to merge 2 commits intoQuickLendX:mainfrom
OluRemiFour:test/bids-for-invoice-by-status
Open

Test/bids for invoice by status#475
OluRemiFour wants to merge 2 commits intoQuickLendX:mainfrom
OluRemiFour:test/bids-for-invoice-by-status

Conversation

@OluRemiFour
Copy link

Pull Request Template

📝 Description

Added tests for get_bids_for_invoice (all records), get_bids_by_status (Placed, Withdrawn, Accepted, Expired), get_bids_by_investor; empty and multiple bids, and All compilation errors have been resolved. cargo test --no-run now succeeds with zero errors.

🎯 Type of Change

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Breaking change
  • Documentation update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance improvement
  • Security enhancement
  • Other (please describe):

🔧 Changes Made

Fix:
test_lifecycle.rs
test_cancel_refund.rs
test_escrow_refund.rs
test_analytics_export_query.rs

Files Modified

New Files Added

Key Changes

🧪 Testing

  • Unit tests pass
  • Integration tests pass
  • Manual testing completed
  • No breaking changes introduced
  • Cross-platform compatibility verified
  • Edge cases tested

Test Coverage

📋 Contract-Specific Checks

  • Soroban contract builds successfully
  • WASM compilation works
  • Gas usage optimized
  • Security considerations reviewed
  • Events properly emitted
  • Contract functions tested
  • Error handling implemented
  • Access control verified

Contract Testing Details

📋 Review Checklist

  • Code follows project style guidelines
  • Documentation updated if needed
  • No sensitive data exposed
  • Error handling implemented
  • Edge cases considered
  • Code is self-documenting
  • No hardcoded values
  • Proper logging implemented

🔍 Code Quality

  • Clippy warnings addressed
  • Code formatting follows rustfmt standards
  • No unused imports or variables
  • Functions are properly documented
  • Complex logic is commented

🚀 Performance & Security

  • Gas optimization reviewed
  • No potential security vulnerabilities
  • Input validation implemented
  • Access controls properly configured
  • No sensitive information in logs

📚 Documentation

  • README updated if needed
  • Code comments added for complex logic
  • API documentation updated
  • Changelog updated (if applicable)

🔗 Related Issues

Closes #334
Fixes #334
Related to #

📋 Additional Notes

🧪 How to Test

  1. cargo test
  2. cargo test --no-run

📸 Screenshots (if applicable)

bird_test

⚠️ Breaking Changes

🔄 Migration Steps (if applicable)


📋 Reviewer Checklist

Code Review

  • Code is readable and well-structured
  • Logic is correct and efficient
  • Error handling is appropriate
  • Security considerations addressed
  • Performance impact assessed

Contract Review

  • Contract logic is sound
  • Gas usage is reasonable
  • Events are properly emitted
  • Access controls are correct
  • Edge cases are handled

Documentation Review

  • Code is self-documenting
  • Comments explain complex logic
  • README updates are clear
  • API changes are documented

Testing Review

  • Tests cover new functionality
  • Tests are meaningful and pass
  • Edge cases are tested
  • Integration tests work correctly

@Baskarayelu
Copy link
Contributor

please resolve the conflicts

@Baskarayelu
Copy link
Contributor

@OluRemiFour resolve the conflicts

@Baskarayelu
Copy link
Contributor

@OluRemiFour Can please you resolve the conflicts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Test – get_bids_for_invoice and get_bids_by_status

2 participants