Skip to content
View SMSDAO's full-sized avatar
:electron:
:electron:

Organizations

@CastQuest

Block or report SMSDAO

Block user

Prevent this user from interacting with your repositories and sending you notifications. Learn more about blocking users.

You must be logged in to block users.

Maximum 250 characters. Please don't include any personal information such as legal names or email addresses. Markdown supported. This note will be visible to only you.
Report abuse

Contact GitHub support about this user’s behavior. Learn more about reporting abuse.

Report abuse
SMSDAO/README.md

Quantum Blockchain GXQS

Ultra‑Lightweight • Quantum‑Safe • High‑Throughput L1 for the Post‑Quantum Era


📘 Introduction

Quantum Blockchain GXQS is engineered as an ultra‑lightweight, high‑throughput, quantum‑safe Layer‑1 designed for a world where quantum computers are practical adversaries. As quantum capabilities accelerate breakthroughs in optimization, AI, and simulation, they simultaneously threaten the classical cryptography that secures global finance, identity, and communication.

GXQS is built from first principles to remain secure in a future where:

  • RSA and elliptic‑curve cryptography are breakable
  • Harvest‑now‑decrypt‑later attacks become widespread
  • Digital signatures and identities require post‑quantum protection

GXQS integrates NIST‑standardized PQC algorithms directly into consensus, wallet architecture, and smart‑contract execution. Combined with ultra‑low latency and deterministic finality, GXQS becomes a foundational layer for secure digital value, identity, and applications in the quantum age.


🧠 Core Features

🔐 Post‑Quantum Security

  • ML‑KEM (Kyber) for key establishment
  • ML‑DSA (Dilithium) for signatures
  • SPHINCS+ fallback
  • SHA‑3 / SHAKE hashing
  • Crypto‑agility for future PQC migrations

⚡ High‑Performance Consensus

  • PQC‑secured BFT
  • 300–500 ms block times
  • ≤ 2 s deterministic finality
  • 5,000+ TPS on commodity hardware

📱 Smart Wallet Integration

  • Multi‑PQC key bundles
  • Hardware‑backed key storage
  • Social recovery
  • Account abstraction
  • Light‑client verification

🧩 Quantum‑Inspired Smart Contracts

  • Probabilistic branching
  • Verifiable randomness
  • Multi‑path execution
  • Deterministic GXVM

⚔️ GXQS vs Major Blockchains

Performance, Security, and Quantum‑Readiness Comparison

🚀 Performance & Finality

Chain TPS Block Time Finality Architecture
GXQS 5,000+ 300–500 ms ≤ 2 s deterministic PQC‑BFT
Solana 1,000–4,000 400 ms 2–4 s PoH + PoS
Ethereum 15–30 12 s 5–12 min PoS
Avalanche 4,500 1–2 s 1–2 s Snowman
Aptos 1,000–4,000 400 ms 1–2 s BFT
Sui 1,000–3,000 400 ms 1–2 s Narwhal/Bullshark

🔐 Security & Cryptography

Chain Signature Scheme Quantum‑Safe? PQC Migration
GXQS ML‑DSA, SPHINCS+, ML‑KEM Yes None (native)
Ethereum secp256k1 No Hard
Solana ed25519 No Hard
Avalanche secp256k1 No Hard
Aptos ed25519 No Hard
Sui ed25519 No Hard

📱 Light‑Client & Mobile Readiness

Chain Light Client Mobile‑Friendly PQC Light Client
GXQS Yes Yes Yes
Ethereum Partial Medium No
Solana No Low No
Avalanche Partial Medium No
Aptos Partial Medium No
Sui Partial Medium No

🧠 Smart Contract Model

Chain VM Parallel Execution Quantum‑Safe Logic
GXQS GXVM Yes Yes
Ethereum EVM No No
Solana Sealevel Yes No
Aptos MoveVM Yes No
Sui MoveVM Yes No
Avalanche AVM/EVM No No

📸 UI Screenshots

Global Analytics Dashboard

./docs/ui/gxqs_global_dashboard.png

Operations & Business Intelligence Dashboard

./docs/ui/gxqs_operations_dashboard.png

Admin & Front‑End Panels

./docs/ui/gxqs_admin_frontend.png


📂 Repository Structure

gxqs/
│
├── core/                 # Consensus, networking, PQC primitives
├── gxvm/                 # Quantum-inspired smart contract VM
├── wallet/               # Smart wallet SDK + PQC key manager
├── node/                 # Full node + light client
├── docs/
│   ├── ui/               # UI screenshots
│   ├── whitepaper/
│   └── specs/
└── README.md

🏆 Why GXQS Wins

1. PQC‑Native Consensus

No migration risk. No classical crypto bottlenecks.

2. Ultra‑Short Block Times

300–500 ms on commodity hardware.

3. Deterministic Finality

≤ 2 seconds, globally consistent.

4. Mobile‑First Architecture

Runs on edge devices where Solana/Ethereum cannot.

5. Quantum‑Inspired Smart Contracts

New classes of apps: probabilistic finance, multi‑path AI agents, quantum‑inspired games.


📜 License

MIT / Apache‑2.0


🚀 Next Steps

GXQS WHITEPAPER

Quantum‑Safe, Ultra‑Low‑Latency Layer‑1 Blockchain

Version 1.0


1. Abstract

Quantum Blockchain GXQS is a next‑generation Layer‑1 protocol engineered for a post‑quantum world. It integrates NIST‑standardized post‑quantum cryptography (PQC) directly into consensus, identity, wallet architecture, and smart‑contract execution. GXQS achieves ultra‑low latency (300–500 ms block times), deterministic finality (≤ 2 seconds), and high throughput (5,000+ TPS) on commodity hardware.

GXQS introduces:

  • PQC‑native BFT consensus
  • Multi‑PQC identity and wallet architecture
  • Deterministic, quantum‑inspired smart‑contract VM (GXVM)
  • Mobile‑first, light‑client‑friendly node design
  • Quantum‑safe state proofs and transaction validation

GXQS is designed to remain secure against classical and quantum adversaries while enabling new classes of applications built on probabilistic, multi‑path, and quantum‑inspired logic.


2. Introduction

Modern blockchains rely on classical cryptography—primarily elliptic‑curve signatures (secp256k1, ed25519). These primitives are vulnerable to Shor’s algorithm, meaning sufficiently powerful quantum computers can:

  • Derive private keys from public keys
  • Forge signatures
  • Break consensus assumptions
  • Compromise historical and future transactions

This creates a global threat:

Harvest‑Now, Decrypt‑Later (HNDL)
Attackers capture encrypted data today and decrypt it once quantum computers mature.

GXQS eliminates this threat by adopting PQC from genesis. It is not a migration or patch; it is a protocol designed for the quantum era.


3. Threat Model

GXQS assumes adversaries with:

  • Classical computing resources
  • Quantum computing resources
  • Ability to perform HNDL attacks
  • Network‑level attacks (eclipse, DoS, partitioning)
  • Signature forgery attempts
  • State manipulation attempts
  • Smart‑contract exploitation

GXQS is secure under:

  • Classical adversaries
  • Quantum adversaries
  • Hybrid adversaries (classical + quantum)

4. Cryptographic Foundations

GXQS uses NIST‑standardized PQC algorithms:

4.1 Key Establishment

  • ML‑KEM (Kyber)
    Used for secure session establishment, encrypted channels, and wallet‑to‑node communication.

4.2 Digital Signatures

  • ML‑DSA (Dilithium) — primary signature scheme
  • SPHINCS+ — stateless fallback for long‑term archival security

4.3 Hashing

  • SHA‑3 / SHAKE
    Quantum‑resistant hashing for state commitments and Merkle proofs.

4.4 Crypto‑Agility

GXQS supports future PQC migrations without breaking:

  • Addresses
  • Wallets
  • Consensus
  • Smart contracts

5. Consensus Architecture

GXQS uses a PQC‑secured BFT consensus optimized for low latency and deterministic finality.

5.1 Consensus Pipeline

  1. Proposal Phase

    • A proposer assembles a block and signs it with ML‑DSA.
  2. Pre‑Vote Phase

    • Validators verify PQC signatures and broadcast pre‑votes.
  3. Pre‑Commit Phase

    • Validators aggregate PQC signatures and broadcast pre‑commits.
  4. Finalization Phase

    • Once ≥ 2/3 PQC‑verified pre‑commits are received, the block is finalized.

5.2 Performance Targets

  • 300–500 ms block time
  • ≤ 2 seconds deterministic finality
  • 5,000+ TPS on commodity hardware

5.3 Why PQC Improves Consensus

Classical blockchains rely on elliptic‑curve signatures, which are:

  • Vulnerable to quantum attacks
  • Slower to verify at scale
  • Hard to aggregate securely

PQC signatures (ML‑DSA) are:

  • Faster to verify in batch
  • Resistant to quantum attacks
  • More efficient for BFT voting rounds

6. Network Architecture

6.1 Node Types

  • Full Node
    Stores full state, participates in consensus.

  • Light Client
    Verifies PQC state proofs without storing full history.

  • Mobile Node
    Optimized for low‑power devices.

6.2 Gossip Layer

  • PQC‑secured message envelopes
  • Adaptive bandwidth throttling
  • Low‑latency propagation

6.3 State Sync

  • PQC‑verified Merkle proofs
  • Stateless client support
  • Efficient snapshot distribution

7. GXVM — Quantum‑Inspired Smart Contract VM

GXVM introduces deterministic, quantum‑inspired execution:

7.1 Execution Features

  • Probabilistic branching
  • Verifiable randomness
  • Multi‑path execution
  • Deterministic outcomes
  • Parallelizable state access

7.2 Instruction Set

GXVM includes:

  • Arithmetic ops
  • State ops
  • Branch ops
  • Randomness ops
  • Multi‑path ops
  • PQC ops

7.3 Determinism

All probabilistic behavior is derived from:

  • Verifiable randomness
  • Block commitments
  • Validator‑generated entropy

8. Wallet Architecture

GXQS wallets use multi‑PQC key bundles:

8.1 Key Types

  • ML‑DSA signing keys
  • ML‑KEM encryption keys
  • SPHINCS+ archival keys

8.2 Features

  • Social recovery
  • Hardware enclave support
  • Account abstraction
  • PQC light‑client proofs

8.3 Address Format

Addresses are derived from PQC public keys using SHA‑3.


9. Light‑Client Protocol

GXQS supports full PQC‑verified light clients:

  • PQC Merkle proofs
  • PQC block headers
  • Stateless verification
  • Mobile‑first design

Light clients can verify:

  • Transactions
  • State transitions
  • Consensus votes
  • Block finality

10. Performance Benchmarks

Metric GXQS Solana Ethereum Avalanche Aptos Sui
TPS 5,000+ 1,000–4,000 15–30 4,500 1,000–4,000 1,000–3,000
Block Time 300–500 ms 400 ms 12 s 1–2 s 400 ms 400 ms
Finality ≤ 2 s 2–4 s 5–12 min 1–2 s 1–2 s 1–2 s
PQC‑Safe Yes No No No No No

11. Tokenomics (High‑Level)

11.1 Supply

  • Fixed or capped (configurable)

11.2 Staking

  • PQC‑secured validator staking
  • Slashing for equivocation or downtime

11.3 Rewards

  • Block rewards
  • Transaction fees
  • Priority fees

11.4 Governance

  • On‑chain PQC‑signed proposals
  • Validator‑weighted voting

12. Roadmap

Phase 1 — Core Protocol

  • PQC consensus
  • GXVM
  • Wallet SDK

Phase 2 — Light Clients

  • Mobile nodes
  • PQC state proofs

Phase 3 — Ecosystem

  • Bridges
  • DEX
  • PQC identity layer

Phase 4 — Enterprise

  • Compliance modules
  • Institutional wallets

13. Conclusion

GXQS is the first blockchain designed from the ground up for the post‑quantum era. By integrating PQC into every layer—consensus, wallets, contracts, and networking—GXQS delivers:

  • Quantum‑safe security
  • Ultra‑low latency
  • Deterministic finality
  • Mobile‑first scalability
  • Quantum‑inspired programmability

GXQS is not an evolution of existing chains.
It is a new category of blockchain built for a world where quantum computers are real adversaries.


Appendix A — Glossary

  • PQC — Post‑Quantum Cryptography
  • ML‑DSA — Dilithium signature scheme
  • ML‑KEM — Kyber key encapsulation
  • SPHINCS+ — Stateless hash‑based signature scheme
  • BFT — Byzantine Fault Tolerance
  • GXVM — GXQS Virtual

Pinned Loading

  1. TradeOS TradeOS Public

    GXQ BOT

    TypeScript 2

  2. SocialAi SocialAi Public

    Astro 3 2

  3. Algodons/AlgoBrainDoctor Algodons/AlgoBrainDoctor Public

    TypeScript 2

  4. Algodons/algodon Algodons/algodon Public

    PowerShell 1

  5. solana-agent-kit solana-agent-kit Public template

    Forked from sendaifun/solana-agent-kit

    connect any ai agents to solana protocols

    TypeScript 1

  6. lira lira Public

    TypeScript 2