-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
change module to github.com/SpiderOak/webwormhole #3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| "github.com/prometheus/client_golang/prometheus/promhttp" | ||
| "golang.org/x/crypto/acme/autocert" | ||
| "nhooyr.io/websocket" | ||
| "webwormhole.io/wormhole" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why don't we use the replace keyword on the flow repo instead? https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14323872/using-forked-package-import-in-go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I meant to add the replace on the flow repo, not in this one. But am not sure exactly what's needed here.
What we need in FLOW-1966 is to run the docker image that can be built by this fork in tr. As discussed in the meetings, If we need to use git submodules then I believe that's a-ok too.
7cd3904 to
8710bdf
Compare
70a9c48 to
b0ebc05
Compare
02452ab to
2541c8a
Compare
…SpiderOak/webwormhole into feature/FLOW-1966-wormhole-docker-image
No description provided.