Skip to content

Tag as supporting KSP 1.3.1#22

Open
cmheisel wants to merge 4 commits intoStarwaster:masterfrom
cmheisel:cmheisel-ksp-131
Open

Tag as supporting KSP 1.3.1#22
cmheisel wants to merge 4 commits intoStarwaster:masterfrom
cmheisel:cmheisel-ksp-131

Conversation

@cmheisel
Copy link

I've been playing on a 1.3.1 install for several days and everything appears to be working.

@HebaruSan
Copy link

HebaruSan commented Nov 12, 2017

Based on #9, I think you also need to update Source/zzVersionChecker.cs line 68 so KSP-AVC doesn't raise spurious warnings.

Also, does this version work on both 1.3.0 and 1.3.1? It might be nice to mark it that way with KSP_VERSION_MIN and KSP_VERSION_MAX.

Tidal-Stream added a commit to Tidal-Stream/ProceduralParts that referenced this pull request Dec 24, 2017
Bump mod version to 1.2.13 and tag as compatible with KSP 1.3.1.

Remove Module Manager dll. We depend on it being installed so we do not
need to ship it. Especially with CKAN this is a cleaner approach.

Remove ProceduralParts.dll. This is an output file and should be
included in releases, not in the source repository. Last commits did not
update this file and if you cloned the master branch thinking this dll
would be newer than the release, you would be wrong. Therefore better to
separate sources and build files.

Copy the README to the root directory so that the github page would have
a description.

Credits to cmheisel and HebaruSan for their commits in
Starwaster#22
Squashed them and added further changes to rebuild it for KSP 1.3.1.

Note - some paths were hardcoded, which made the rebuild cumbersome.
We should look into how to make the solution file (.sln) portable,
for example using environmental variables.
@Tidal-Stream
Copy link

Starwaster has not merged this yet and it seems like @cmheisel has not rebuild it, so I forked the repo, squashed these commits, made some other changes, and rebuild it for KSP 1.3.1. I launched a vessel with procedural tanks and it seems to work fine. Here is the release

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

Comments