Address PR review comments: documentation consistency and code improvements#10
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Steake <530040+Steake@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR addresses automated review feedback by improving documentation consistency and code quality across multiple areas. The changes align version numbers and test counts, improve variable naming conventions, and replace hardcoded values with configurable parameters.
- Documentation fixes ensure consistency across FINAL_REPORT.md (v0.1), HOLISTIC_VERIFICATION.md (27 tests for bitcell-crypto, 157+ total), and timeline alignment
- Code improvements include standardized variable naming (
lhs/rhs), configurable block timing, extracted constants, and completed implementation ofprune_old_blocks - Documentation enhancement for ZK circuit parameters with test vs production guidance
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| docs/IMPLEMENTATION_SUMMARY.md | Clarified development timeframe from "focused development session" to "3-week development sprint" |
| docs/HOLISTIC_VERIFICATION.md | Fixed test count discrepancies (27 tests for bitcell-crypto, 157+ total) |
| docs/FINAL_REPORT.md | Corrected version from v0.3 to v0.1 to align with SUMMARY.md |
| docs/COMPLETION_STRATEGY.md | Updated target completion from End of December 2025 to Mid-January 2026 |
| crates/bitcell-zkvm/src/interpreter.rs | Renamed interpreter operands from a/b to lhs/rhs for clarity |
| crates/bitcell-zkp/src/battle_constraints.rs | Added comprehensive documentation for test vs production ZK circuit configuration |
| crates/bitcell-state/src/storage.rs | Completed prune_old_blocks implementation with actual block/header deletion logic |
| crates/bitcell-node/src/validator.rs | Removed hardcoded block time constant in favor of configurable value |
| crates/bitcell-node/src/network.rs | Extracted MAX_MESSAGE_SIZE constant (10MB) for message size validation |
| crates/bitcell-node/src/config.rs | Added block_time_secs field to NodeConfig with documentation |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| /// | ||
| /// # Returns | ||
| /// * `Ok(())` on success, or error message on failure | ||
| pub fn prune_old_blocks(&self, keep_last: u64) -> Result<(), String> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The newly implemented prune_old_blocks function lacks test coverage. Consider adding a test case that verifies the deletion of old blocks and headers while preserving the most recent blocks, similar to the existing test patterns in the same file (e.g., test_store_and_retrieve_header).
Addresses feedback from automated PR review identifying documentation inconsistencies and code quality issues across the codebase.
Documentation Fixes
FINAL_REPORT.mdfrom v0.3 to v0.1 to matchSUMMARY.mdHOLISTIC_VERIFICATION.mdto show 27 tests for bitcell-crypto and 157+ total (was showing conflicting 39/148)COMPLETION_STRATEGY.mdtarget to Mid-January 2026 to match 36-day estimateCode Improvements
a/btolhs/rhsNodeConfig.block_time_secsinstead of hardcoded constantMAX_MESSAGE_SIZE(10MB) for network message size limitprune_old_blockswith actual deletion logic✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.