test: add unit tests for output-formatter module#366
test: add unit tests for output-formatter module#366nikolasdehor wants to merge 1 commit intoSynkraAI:mainfrom
Conversation
32 tests covering PersonalizedOutputFormatter: persona loading from agent YAML, graceful degradation, header/status/output/metrics/signature building, Portuguese verb conjugation, tone-based messages (pragmatic, empathetic, analytical, collaborative, neutral), and full format output.
|
@nikolasdehor is attempting to deploy a commit to the Pedro Valério Lopez's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR adds comprehensive unit test coverage for the PersonalizedOutputFormatter class, which generates personalized task execution reports with agent personality injection. The tests validate persona loading from YAML configuration, template building methods, Portuguese verb conjugation, tone-based message generation, and graceful error handling.
Changes:
- Added 32 unit tests for the
PersonalizedOutputFormatterclass covering all public and private methods - Implemented comprehensive test scenarios including happy paths, error handling, and edge cases
- Used Jest mocks for file system and YAML parsing dependencies to enable isolated unit testing
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| const formatter = new PersonalizedOutputFormatter(mockAgent, mockTask, {}); | ||
| const metrics = formatter.buildFixedMetrics(); | ||
| expect(metrics).toContain('0/0'); | ||
| expect(metrics).toContain('N/A'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test only checks that 'N/A' appears in the metrics output, but doesn't validate the complete formatting. The implementation will actually render 'N/A%' when coverage is missing (since line 211 of the source always appends '%'). Consider making the assertion more specific by checking for 'N/A%' to ensure the test accurately reflects the actual output format, or adjust the implementation to conditionally add the percent sign only when coverage is not 'N/A'.
| expect(metrics).toContain('N/A'); | |
| expect(metrics).toContain('N/A%'); |
|
Consolidated into #424 |
Summary
PersonalizedOutputFormatterclassTest Coverage
Closes #364