fix: update PR description creator to use gpt-5.2-codex#1359
Open
jekabs-karklins wants to merge 5 commits intodevelopfrom
Open
fix: update PR description creator to use gpt-5.2-codex#1359jekabs-karklins wants to merge 5 commits intodevelopfrom
jekabs-karklins wants to merge 5 commits intodevelopfrom
Conversation
jekabs-karklins
requested review from
TCMeldrum
and removed request for
a team
jekabs-karklins
changed the title
Contributor
Author
|
@TCMeldrum I have marked this as |
TCMeldrum
approved these changes
Feb 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Update the PR description workflow to use the v2 action and configurable model input (set to gpt-5.2-codex
Motivation and Context
Previous implementation used GPT-4 which needed to be updated.
Changes
swapActions/pr-description-autogenusage from@masterto@v2.JIRA_BASE_URL,PR_DESCRIPTION_MODEL) instead of hardcoding.How Has This Been Tested
Not tested (workflow change only).