Skip to content

Conversation

@majialoong
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #9959

Brief Description

Thread use the correct name prefix.

How Did You Test This Change?

Unit test

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 48.72%. Comparing base (b5da00a) to head (48e08cb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #9960      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      48.81%   48.72%   -0.09%     
+ Complexity     12760    12741      -19     
=============================================
  Files           1324     1324              
  Lines          96407    96407              
  Branches       12435    12435              
=============================================
- Hits           47057    46977      -80     
- Misses         43605    43666      +61     
- Partials        5745     5764      +19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug] Correct thread name prefix for file recycling executor in tiered store

2 participants