Skip to content

Conversation

@qianye1001
Copy link
Contributor

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes

Fixes #9970

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Change-Id: I64287b60b56d5526dd299bfa3989581953e1a2a8
Change-Id: Icab066eb50669ef95d05b1b140cdb3c810bceec2
Change-Id: Ibf9ab37aa9b47734fe2ea76917d7dc30ad7d6526
Change-Id: I1dee395ecb3adb61b1414cc2bd3ae1f0ec25e0fd
Change-Id: Iae0b9b5cdc334901527864242ee8ceef044c8eac
Change-Id: Ib5984f3e4aef46d32be03f61c5fd843e8470ef70
Change-Id: I5b506cbeee7c810b2401484309ab3ab769720cad
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 60.27397% with 29 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 48.72%. Comparing base (b5da00a) to head (afd97f3).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...tmq/proxy/service/route/MessageQueuePenalizer.java 41.17% 17 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...etmq/proxy/service/route/MessageQueueSelector.java 66.66% 0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...ocketmq/proxy/service/route/TopicRouteService.java 78.57% 1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...pache/rocketmq/client/latency/MQFaultStrategy.java 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...q/proxy/service/route/AddressableMessageQueue.java 83.33% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #9971      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      48.81%   48.72%   -0.10%     
+ Complexity     12763    12733      -30     
=============================================
  Files           1324     1325       +1     
  Lines          96407    96399       -8     
  Branches       12435    12433       -2     
=============================================
- Hits           47064    46968      -96     
- Misses         43600    43671      +71     
- Partials        5743     5760      +17     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement] Refactor the MessageQueueSelector to support more flexible queue selection strategy

2 participants