Skip to content

Conversation

@ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Apr 22, 2025

I'm proposing this as an eventual replacement (before 1.0) of our hack around the fact that the in identifier is reserved in CEL. We need this for protovalidate-cc especially so we can start removing our cel-cpp patches.

Protovalidate PR: bufbuild/protovalidate#352

I'm proposing this as an eventual replacement (before 1.0) of our hack around the fact that the in identifier is reserved in CEL. We need this for protovalidate-cc especially so we can start removing our cel-cpp patches.

Protovalidate PR: bufbuild/protovalidate#352
@ghost ghost force-pushed the jchadwick/getfield branch from 4bc8d11 to 3aa41f1 Compare April 22, 2025 06:07
@ghost ghost marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2025 06:57
ghost pushed a commit to bufbuild/protovalidate that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
This is a proposal to remove our hack around the fact the `in`
identifier is reserved in CEL. This is especially urgent for
protovalidate-cc which is currently carrying patches to the CEL
implementation in order to enable it, since cel-cpp doesn't allow this
sort of functionality to be added in at runtime.

Runtime PRs:
- Go: bufbuild/protovalidate-go#225
- C++: bufbuild/protovalidate-cc#90
- Python: bufbuild/protovalidate-python#290
- Java: bufbuild/protovalidate-java#271
@ghost ghost requested a review from Alfus April 22, 2025 23:36
John Chadwick added 4 commits April 22, 2025 20:00
(Yes this commit is a little large, but it's just due to the renames. Nothing substantial here.)
@ghost ghost merged commit a254193 into main Apr 23, 2025
8 checks passed
@ghost ghost deleted the jchadwick/getfield branch April 23, 2025 14:44
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant