Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
30 changes: 28 additions & 2 deletions draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation-54.xml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -180,9 +180,35 @@
</list>
</t>
</section>
<section title='Contradiction regarding bundle-only "m=" sections' toc="default">
<t>
Since the approval of the WebRTC specification documents, the IETF has become aware of an inconsistency
between the document specifying JSEP and the document specifying BUNDLE (RFC 8829 and RFC 8843, respectively).
Rather than delaying publication further to come to a resolution, the documents are being published as they were
originally approved. The IETF intends to restart work on these technologies, and revised versions of these
documents will be published as soon as a resolution becomes available.
</t>
<t>
The specific issue involves the handling of "m=" sections that are designated as bundle-only, as discussed
in RFC 8829, Section 4.1.1. Currently, there is divergence between JSEP and BUNDLE, as well as between these
specifications and existing browser implementations:
<list style="symbols">
<t>
JSEP prescribes that said "m=" sections should use port zero and add an "a=bundle-only" attribute in
initial offers, but not in answers or subsequent offers.
</t>
<t>
BUNDLE prescribes that these "m=" sections should be marked as described in the previous point,
but in all offers and answers.
</t>
<t>
Most current browsers do not mark any "m=" sections with port zero and instead use the same port for
all bundled "m=" sections; one follows the JSEP behavior.
</t>
</list>
</t>
</section>
</section>


<section anchor="sec-term" title="Terminology" toc="default">
<t>
<list style="symbols">
Expand Down