Skip to content

Conversation

@AriWebb
Copy link

@AriWebb AriWebb commented Oct 4, 2023

Reasons for making this change

We want cl search to have uniform functionality. Namely, we want the date parser for the ".after" and ."joined_after" arguments to behave similarly.

Related issues

Resolving Issue 4630 issue.

Checklist

  • I've added a screenshot of the changes, if this is a frontend change
  • I've added and/or updated tests, if this is a backend change
  • I've run the pre-commit.sh script
  • I've updated docs, if needed

@AriWebb AriWebb linked an issue Oct 4, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@AriWebb AriWebb force-pushed the 4360-cl-search-bug-fix branch from 7faf458 to b8dd15d Compare October 19, 2023 18:27
@AriWebb AriWebb force-pushed the 4360-cl-search-bug-fix branch from dd60626 to 7faf458 Compare November 15, 2023 18:54
@percyliang
Copy link
Collaborator

Is this ready for review?

@AriWebb
Copy link
Author

AriWebb commented Nov 16, 2023

yes this is ready for review @epicfaace

time3 = datetime.now().isoformat()

# Check date format works correctly, GH issue #4360
check_not_equals(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is oddly specific - can we test for what the output should be?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"cl search" doesn't work with single-digit months

3 participants